RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01954
INDEX NUMBER: 110.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code of “2C,” entry-level separation without
characterization of service, be changed to one that would allow his
reentry into the Air Force.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has always regretted his decision to separate from the Air
Force. The reason he gave for separating was not the actual reason
why he separated. He has matured in the five years since he left
the service and the reasons for the chest pains he experienced no
longer exist.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty on 4 Dec 96 as an Airman Basic.
On 10 Apr 97, his commander notified him that he was recommending
his discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory entry-level
performance. The specific reasons for the commander’s actions
were:
a. On 6 Apr 97, he made a written statement expressing why
he wanted out of the Air force.
b. On 25 Mar 97, he was diagnosed as having a mental
condition so severe that his ability to function in the military
environment was significantly impaired.
c. On 14 Mar 97, he failed to arrive for class on time and
was unshaven.
d. On 25 Feb 97, he violated AETCI 36-6003, when he was
found with his feet on the day room table, for which he was
counseled.
Applicant waived his right to consult counsel and to submit
statements.
On 16 Apr 97, he was separated with an entry-level separation and
issued an RE code of “2C.”.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS evaluated the applicant’s discharge processing. Based
on the documentation in the file, they believe the discharge was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. They defer to the recommendation of DPPAE
regarding change of the applicant’s RE code.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit c.
AFPC/DPPAE advises that the applicant’s RE code is correct. They
do not make a recommendation.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluations by recounting
the events that led to his decision to seek separation from
service. He also provides a letter of support from his mother,
which corroborates his version of events. The applicant states
that he is asking the Board for another chance to serve his
country.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit
F.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. While it appears that the
applicant’s discharge from the Air Force was warranted based on the
circumstances at the time, the Board accepts the applicant’s
statement that he was dealing with an overwhelming set of
circumstances beyond his control. In that regard, it is not clear
whether applicant was provided the necessary assistance to help him
succeed in the Air Force. Given the short time that the applicant
actually served and the time that has since passed, the Board
believes the applicant should be afforded the opportunity to see if
he can meet present standards to serve in the Air Force. Whether
or not he is successful will depend on the needs of the service and
our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be allowed to
return to any branch of the service. Therefore, the Board
recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed from “2C” to
“3K”, Secretarial Authority.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 16 April 1997,
in conjunction with his entry-level separation, he was issued a
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “3K.”
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-
01954 in Executive Session on 23 January 2003, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn Sparks, Panel Chair
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 3 Jul 02.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Oct 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 11 Oct 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, undated.
CATHLYNN SPARKS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01954
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show that
on 16 April 1997, in conjunction with his entry-level separation,
he was issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “3K.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02890
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 Jul 97 and was assigned to Keesler AFB, MS. On 19 Mar 98, he was notified of his commander’s intention to recommend discharge for minor disciplinary infractions with a general characterization. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE asserts the applicant’s RE code of “2C” [sic] (Involuntarily separated with an honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. He requests additional information be provided concerning his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03882
The reason for the commander’s recommendation was the applicant’s evaluation and diagnosis by the Behavioral Analysis Service with Axis I: Phase of Life Problem, maladjustment to military service, disqualifying severity. At the time the applicant was evaluated and diagnosed by mental health personnel with the unsuiting condition leading to his discharge, the evaluating psychiatrist noted that the applicant was “experiencing a temporary problem that should be “resolvable” within the next six...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03735 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge: or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to RE Code...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00007 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant requests that his “2C” reentry (RE) code, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to “3C,” “First Term airman not...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01354 INDEX CODE: 100.06 . Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s RE code of 2C be changed to one requiring a waiver; that is, RE-3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate). Exhibit B.
On 16 Apr 98, he was honorably discharged in the grade of airman (E-2) under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (unsatisfactory performance), with a separation code of “JHJ”. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is appended at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Education and Training Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAT, stated that after reviewing the applicant’s request, reconsideration of his separation code should be approved. RICHARD A....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03022 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded to a code in the three (3) series to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...