ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01567
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 29 September 1998, the Board considered the applicant’s request that his
general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board found insufficient
evidence of an error or injustice and denied the application. For an
accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and
the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings at Exhibit F.
In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from
the Armed Forces of the United States, dated 8 November 2002, the applicant
requests reconsideration of his application and provides additional
documentation (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
additional documentation submitted by the applicant, we find no evidence of
error or injustice. In this respect, we note that the applicant’s
discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force
Instruction in effect at the time of his separation and he was afforded all
the rights to which entitled. We also note that, on 14 May 1998, the AFDRB
considered his request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable
and found no evidence of inequity or impropriety that would justify
changing his discharge. The applicant has provided no evidence to indicate
that his separation was inappropriate. There being insufficient evidence
to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought.
2. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the
discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. We have considered the
applicant’s overall quality of service, the events that precipitated the
discharge, and available evidence related to his post-service activities
and accomplishments. On balance, we do not believe that clemency is
warranted.
3. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1998-
01567 in Executive Session on 29 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 293, dated 9 Nov 02, w/atchs.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel s response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1996-02552A
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1996-02552 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Oct 97, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01846B
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. In a letter, dated 24 January 2002, the applicant provided additional documentation and requested restoration of his rank of staff sergeant (Exhibit H); however, in a letter, dated 1 February 2002, he was advised that since his request was a new request, he should submit an application to the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1996-02954-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see Exhibit E. On 1 May 2003, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, contending that his discharge was unfair and that he did not commit fraud against the government. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01826
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F (with Exhibits A through E). Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. By letter, dated 29 Jul 03, the applicant provided additional documentary evidence, which is attached at H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In an earlier finding, we...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 4GN 2 2 1998 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02414 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Y RESUME OF CASE On 28 January 1998, the Board considered applicant's 28 August 1997 application requesting that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. A Discharge Review Board convened in April 1958 and considered the issues in the applicant's application for correction of military record and they concur...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 87-03917 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES RESUME OF CASE: On 13 “January 1988, the Board considered applicant‘s request that his discharge be changed to a medical discharge. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
He was to be promoted to E-7 under the 12/20 rule. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03198 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He got into trouble in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-00762A
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...