AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 87-03917
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
RESUME OF CASE:
On 13 “January 1988, the Board considered applicant‘s request that
his discharge be changed to a medical discharge. The Board found
the application was not timely filed and that it would not be in
the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. A copy of the
Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUD ES THAT:
1. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional
documentation submitted by applicant, we are still not persuaded
that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. The
documentation applicant has provided is noted; however, it does
not substantiate that he was physically unfit for continued
military service at the time of his discharge. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence that the applicant has been the victim of an
error or injustice, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
2. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented
did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
.
I
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 October 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. David G. Van Gasbeck, Member
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
-
.
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F.
Exhibit G.
Record of Proceedings, dated 13 Jan 88, w/atchs.
Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Dec 97, w/atchs.
d.x".
VAUG N E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
2
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01188 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Retirements Branch, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that there are no provisions of law to allow Regular captains who have been nonselected for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01188
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01188 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Retirements Branch, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that there are no provisions of law to allow Regular captains who have been nonselected for promotion to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02265 INDEX NUMBER: 133.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The decision that he retire in the grade of major resulting from the officer grade determination (OGD) done by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) be reconsidered. In addition, he put...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at E. In an undated letter the applicant provided additional documentation and requested reconsideration of his application. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit F. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional documentation submitted by applicant, we are...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-00347 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: He receive a medical retirement and awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and states the applicant was not eligible for disability retirement since laws in effect at the time of his discharge specifically denied retirement eligibility for...
A complete copy of the additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. The Chief, Retirements/Separations Division, HQ ARPC/DPA, explains the eligibility for Reserve retired pay under the provisions of Title 10, USC, Section 12731. While the deceased member’s military personnel record indicates he completed 19 years, 10 months and 19 days of honorable Federal service, only 17 years, 10 months, and 19 days of this time is satisfactory service. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 1 December 1997, the State of Department of Veterans Affairs, provided additional documentation and requested reconsideration of the applicant’s request for award of the PH (Exhibit G). A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 25 June 1997, the State of of Veterans Affairs, requested reconsideration request for award of the PH (Exhibit G). ' Examiner's...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1998-01567A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1998-01567 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01264
The applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 August 1980 for a period of 4 years. On 17 August 1984, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration Term of Service) and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4I (Serving on Control Roster). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Staff Judge Advocate, AFPC/JA, reviewed this application and states the applicant...
The applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 August 1980 for a period of 4 years. On 17 August 1984, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration Term of Service) and issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4I (Serving on Control Roster). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Staff Judge Advocate, AFPC/JA, reviewed this application and states the applicant...