SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01846
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that his former grade of staff sergeant (E-
5) was reinstated prior to his discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 10 June 1999, the Board favorably considered the applicant’s request
that his discharge be upgraded to honorable (Exhibit A).
In an application, dated 16 July 1999, the applicant requested the Article
15 imposed on 4 August 1981, be removed from his records, and his former
rank of staff sergeant (E-5) be restored (Exhibit B).
On 9 October 1999, the Board considered his request that the Article 15
imposed on 4 August 1981, be removed from his records, and his former rank
of staff sergeant (E-5) be restored. The Board found insufficient evidence
of an error or injustice and denied the application. For an accounting of
the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale
for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Addendum to Record of
Proceedings at Exhibit E.
In a letter, dated 24 January 2002, the applicant provided additional
documentation and requested restoration of his rank of staff sergeant
(Exhibit H); however, in a letter, dated 1 February 2002, he was advised
that since his request was a new request, he should submit an application
to the Board (Exhibit I).
In an application, dated 5 February 2002, the applicant requested that his
records be corrected to show his former grade of staff sergeant (E-5) was
reinstated prior to his discharge (Exhibit J).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant, in essence, is requesting the Board void the Article 15 and
reinstate his former rank of staff sergeant on the basis of clemency;
however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
additional documentation submitted with his request, we do not believe
sufficient evidence of an error or injustice has been presented to warrant
favorable consideration. We have considered his overall quality of
service, the events which precipitated the Article 15, and available
evidence related to his post-service activities and accomplishments. On
balance, we do not believe that clemency is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1999-
01846 in Executive Session on 7 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Addendum to Record of Proceedings,
dated 19 Jan 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 3 May 01.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Sep 01.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Feb 02.
Exhibit J. DD Form 149, dated 5 Feb 02, w/atchs.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
A copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP), with attachments, is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant has now submitted a letter, dated 29 April 1999, attaching a statement from a retired senior master sergeant, who was the applicant’s immediate supervisor for the period 1961 to 1963, who states that the applicant is deserving of the AFCM. After reviewing the applicant’s military records and the documentation submitted, the majority of the Board believes there was an injustice to the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00904
A copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP), with attachments, is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant has now submitted a letter, dated 29 April 1999, attaching a statement from a retired senior master sergeant, who was the applicant’s immediate supervisor for the period 1961 to 1963, who states that the applicant is deserving of the AFCM. After reviewing the applicant’s military records and the documentation submitted, the majority of the Board believes there was an injustice to the...
(Exhibit D) In an application dated 29 August 1990, the applicant requested that (1) he be promoted to master sergeant (E-7), (2) he be reinstated into active duty, (3) the time out of the service be counted towards retirement, (4) he receive all back pay and allowances, and (5) the portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus, which was recouped, be reimbursed. On 16 July 1991, the Board considered and recommended granting the applicant’s request for a service retirement from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-04682
(Exhibit D) In an application dated 29 August 1990, the applicant requested that (1) he be promoted to master sergeant (E-7), (2) he be reinstated into active duty, (3) the time out of the service be counted towards retirement, (4) he receive all back pay and allowances, and (5) the portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus, which was recouped, be reimbursed. On 16 July 1991, the Board considered and recommended granting the applicant’s request for a service retirement from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01172 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated the In-Place Consecutive Overseas Tour (IPCOT) Travel Entitlement. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPC, dated 14 May 98. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-01172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01172 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated the In-Place Consecutive Overseas Tour (IPCOT) Travel Entitlement. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPC, dated 14 May 98. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-01172 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01826
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F (with Exhibits A through E). Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. By letter, dated 29 Jul 03, the applicant provided additional documentary evidence, which is attached at H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In an earlier finding, we...
If the suspension date of 18 April 2000 is changed to a date before the PECD of 31 March 2000, the Board could also direct supplemental promotion consideration for cycle 00E5. The applicant has not related any new or additional information, not available at, or near, the time when he received the action, which indicate circumstances warranting a set aside. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-02566 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-01916
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.