Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1997-03067
Original file (BC-1997-03067.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-1997-03067
            INDEX CODE:  112.01

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His home of record (HOR) be changed from Wilson, WY to Santa Rosa, CA.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His HOR on reentry into active duty was in error.  He contends that he
moved from XXXXX, CA to his new  duty  station  in  Wichita,  KS.   He
states that he has not  lived  in  XXXXX,  WY  since  graduating  from
college and accepting a commission in the Air Force in 1988.

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  has  provided  a  personal
statement, copies of Special Order ordering him to  active  duty,  and
copies of personal income tax and property tax forms from  California.


Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Upon initial entry into the Air Force in 1988, the applicant lived  in
XXXXX, WY, which became his Home of Record.  Upon reentry into  active
duty in June 2003, he lived in XXXXX, CA.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and  recommended  denial.   DPPAE
notes that the applicant applied, in 1997, for the same relief and was
advised that his HOR could only be changed under certain circumstances
and with specific evidence.  They note that he has now reapplied  with
new evidence; however, the evidence does not support  his  request  or
identify an error as the evidence is dated  well  after  he  initially
entered  military  service.   DPPAE  states   that   they   found   no
documentation to substantiate changing the applicant’s HOR.   The  HOR
is set when the member initially enters military service and cannot be
changed based solely on the member’s convenience.

AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
18 July 2003 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
1997-03067 in  Executive  Session  on  2  September  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Mr. Mike Novel, Member
      Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member






The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 May 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Jul 03.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 03.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03743

    Original file (BC-2005-03743.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The only permanent address he had at the time was his parent’s temporary residence located in Virginia Beach. We note that upon is appointment in the USAF his home of record was Virginia Beach, VA. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his home of record at the time of his entry on active duty was 95 1042 Hoama...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703558

    Original file (9703558.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, we recommend denial of the 8.. OGAN,C t,USAF Chief, Skills c \ DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM HQ AFPC/JA (Maj Reed) 550 C Street West Ste 44 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4746 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records - c 30 January 1998 - REOUESTED ACTION: ADDlicantmxmests that her home of record OKOR) be changed fro BASIS FOR REQUEST: Applicant believes that it is an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01526

    Original file (BC-2007-01526.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 October 1972, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard where he continued to serve attaining the grade of master sergeant (E-7) with a date of rank of 24 May 1988. The Air Force Overseas Ribbons-Short/Long Tour (AFOR-ST/LT) was not authorized during the time the applicant was serving on active duty from 1968-1972. We note that AFPC has administratively corrected the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect the technical training courses he completed; therefore, we will only address...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03986

    Original file (BC 2014 03986 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, associated with her 13 Jul 03 release from active duty, her HOR at time of entry is listed as 36707 San Pedro Dr., Apt 120, Fremont, CA 94536. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a response stating when she was in contact with her recruiter she was a full-time out-of-state student at Alliant International University in California. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01523

    Original file (BC-2003-01523.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. He was separated from the Air Force on 20 December 2000 with a general (under honorable conditions discharge and issued an RE code of “2B”. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03605

    Original file (BC-2002-03605.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed. Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the commander’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03011

    Original file (BC-2002-03011.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. DoD has determined that it would be unfair to the applicant and the service if the limited service of the airman were characterized. (Exhibit D) HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms that the RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03011

    Original file (BC-2002-03011.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. DoD has determined that it would be unfair to the applicant and the service if the limited service of the airman were characterized. (Exhibit D) HQ AFPC/DPPAE confirms that the RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00713

    Original file (BC-2006-00713.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Mar 06, AFPC/DPPAE requested the applicant provide documentation to support her claim (i.e., 2002 W-2 from CA, if wages were earned any time during that year, a photocopy of CA drivers license issued before entry on active duty, or a copy of her CA vehicle registration, etc. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00762

    Original file (BC-2003-00762.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00762 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to reenlist. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...