Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202973
Original file (0202973.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02973
            INDEX CODE:  131.05

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Date of Rank (DOR) to Captain be changed to 23 Dec 98 and  that
he receive any associated back pay.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was selected for promotion to the rank of Captain by  the  CY97C
Captain (LAF/JAG/CHAP/MSC/BSC/NC) Central Selection Board  but  was
unable to pin-on  because  of  a  projected  separation  date.   He
separated in  Jan  98,  and  accepted  an  individual  mobilization
augmentee (IMA) billet in Apr 99, with points for a  good  year  in
1998.

His research determined that his promotion selection on the  active
duty list (ADL) should have transferred over to the reserve  active
status  list  (RASL)  upon  his  acceptance   into   the   Reserve.
Conversations  with  HQ  ARPC/DPJA  suggest   that   the   one-year
requirement to serve as  a  reservist  is  eliminated  under  these
findings.

In support of applicant’s appeal, he provided a copy  of  Promotion
Statement of Understanding  and  his  Reserve  Promotion  order  to
Captain.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Documentation provided by the applicant  indicated  that  while  on
active duty he was selected for promotion to the grade  of  captain
with a projected date of rank of 23 Dec 98.  He was  released  from
active duty on 4 Jan 98, and transferred to the Air Force  Reserve,
effective 5 Jan 98.

Information  extracted  from  the  Personnel  Data   System   (PDS)
indicates his total active federal commissioning service date/total
years service date (TAFCSD/TYSD) as 16 Dec 94.  His  DOR  to  first
Lieutenant was 23 Dec 96.  He is currently serving in  the  Reserve
grade of captain having been  promoted  to  that  grade,  effective
1 Oct 00.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ ARPC/DPB reviewed this application and recommended denial.  They
indicate the applicant was placed on  the  FY02  Captain  selection
list with a projected DOR of 23 Dec 01, which was  the  appropriate
RASL promotion list based on the law in effect at that time.

Utilizing  the  authority  of  10  U.S.C.  Section  14308(e),   the
applicant’s senior rater requested an accelerated promotion and  he
was awarded a DOR of 1 Oct 00, 14 months earlier than his RASL date
allowed by law.

The original active duty promotion date has no  applicability  once
an officer transfers to the RASL.  In the applicant’s case, he  was
promoted when he met all the legislative and policy requirements to
hold the higher grade.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 11 Oct 02 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we are convinced that the applicant was promoted  at
the appropriate time when he met all  the  legislative  and  policy
requirements to hold the higher grade.  Therefore,  we  agree  with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of  an  error
or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
02-02973  in  Executive  Session  on  8  January  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. William H. Anderson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ ARPC/DPB, dated 1 Oct 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Oct 02.




                                   ROBERT S. BOYD
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03824

    Original file (BC-2002-03824.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2504, he should have been transferred from the ADL to the RASL and subsequently promoted to major with an appropriate DOR as an active Reserve officer. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicable statutes and regulations were properly applied in determining the applicant's date of rank to the grade...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02853

    Original file (BC-2004-02853.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Jan 00, the 8AF/CC directed the Article 15 be filed in the applicant’s HQ USAF OSR and Officer Command Selection Record. HQ ARPC/DPBS confirmed by a 10 Jan 05 email that, in fact, the applicant was considered, but not selected, by the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) major board that convened in Feb 04, as he contends in Exhibit D. Pursuant to an AFBCMR Staff inquiry, the applicant faxed copies of his 25 Aug 04 administrative attempt to have the 8AF/CC remove the Article 15 from his OSR. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03994

    Original file (BC-2011-03994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03994 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) be changed from 1 Oct 07 to 11 Jul 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00089

    Original file (BC-2002-00089.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This section states, “…a reserve officer’s years of service include all service, other than constructive service, of the officer as a commissioned officer of any uniformed service (other than service as a warrant officer).” The applicant believes that use of the time as a warrant officer should not count when computing time for establishing MSD. Applicant’s complete response to the additional Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02745

    Original file (BC-2011-02745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Before joining the Air Force Reserve, he was selected for promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2006B (CY06B) Active Duty board in Sep 06. AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation, and Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 6.4, states that any officer selected for promotion to a higher grade, who transfers from the ADL to the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) of the same armed force, will receive their promotion providing the officer remains in the same competitive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0000516

    Original file (0000516.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Officer Promotion & Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, recommended that, since the applicant is not eligible for active duty promotions, he remain on the RASL and be eligible to compete for Reserve promotion boards. It is further recommended that, if he is not selected by the FY00 board, he be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by SSB for any subsequent Air Force Reserve selection boards for which he may have been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001994

    Original file (0001994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Promotion Board Secretariat, HQ ARPC/DPB, stated that the applicant provided a copy of the mandatory [in- and above-the- promotion zone (I/APZ)] and Position Vacancy (PV) date of rank (DOR) requirements for the 99 March Chaplains Captain Selection Board. As DPB previously stated, HQ ARPC/HC provided a letter attesting that the IMA chaplains did not have any PV quotas available for the FY00 Captains...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03885

    Original file (BC-2002-03885.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was appointed in the Reserve of the Air Force as a lieutenant colonel on 30 Sep 02, under the Retired Active Duty Reserve Accession Program (RADRAP). Since the applicant must be retired to apply under the Retired Active Duty Reserve Accession Program the applicant was not placed on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) from the Active Duty List (ADL). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. In the applicant’s response to the HQ USAF/JAG opinion, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01058

    Original file (BC-2003-01058.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a system failure to notify his wing of his promotion eligibility, a Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) was not staffed and forwarded to ARPC prior to the 20 Dec 02 deadline. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion consideration by the FY04 PV board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02698

    Original file (BC-2011-02698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A break in service which was corrected by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) caused his DOR to major to be incorrect. The applicant was considered and selected by the CY10 major promotion board with a DOR of 1 October 10. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...