RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01058
INDEX CODE: 131.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be considered for a Position Vacancy (PV) promotion to the grade of
major.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to a system failure to notify his wing of his promotion eligibility, a
Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) was not staffed and forwarded to ARPC
prior to the 20 Dec 02 deadline. Upon discovery of the situation, a PRF
was prepared and forwarded by his wing commander to the board, but was
rejected because of its tardiness.
In support of his request applicant provided a copy of his letter to the
board President, his Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the
period 27 May 01 through 26 May 02, a copy of his PRF prepared for the
U0404A PV board, and a letter from HQ ARPC. His complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant, an Air Force Reserve officer, is currently serving on active
duty as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) in the grade of captain,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 18 Jul 98.
He was nominated by his senior rater for promotion consideration by the
FY04 Line and Health Professions Major Position Vacancy Board, which
convened at HQ ARPC on 3 Feb 03. ARPC Memorandum 02-12, dated 13 Aug 02
stipulated the deadline for submission of PRFs for PV consideration was 20
Dec 02. Applicant's PRF was received at HQ ARPC on 23 Jan 03.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPB recommends denial. DPB states that requirements for submission of
PV nominations were established and published four months prior to the
suspense date. The PRF in question was received 34 days after the
published suspense date, 11 days prior to the convening of the selection
board. Adequate advanced notice was provided to all Military Personnel
Flights so that nominations could be received by the established suspense
date. The DPB evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states that he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion
consideration by the FY04 PV board. While he agrees with the comments of
the DPB, applicant states that the root cause of the problem is that
Memorandum 02-12 states the "MPFs can identify eligible officers using the
'Reports Processing' menu in the Promotion Recommendation and In-board
Support Information Management System (PRISM)." He has no record of being
listed in PRISM as promotion eligible despite meeting eligibility
requirements. Because he was not identified as eligible in PRISM no formal
notification of his promotion eligibility was generated. Upon unofficial
notification, his PRF was staffed as quickly as possible. Board
administrators stated that a late letter signed by the wing commander must
be forwarded with the late PRF for promotion consideration. The late
letter was accomplished and forwarded with the PRF on 23 Jan 03. However,
the PRF was returned due to its tardiness. Applicant feels that he did all
that was reasonably within his control to facilitate consideration for
promotion, but systems, policies, and procedures denied him the
opportunity.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement,
additional copies of documents previously submitted, a letter he received
from ARPC/DPBA, and copies of email communications. His complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice that would warrant corrective action.
In this respect, the eligibility criteria for consideration by the FY04 PV
board specifies that the member must have a DOR of 30 Sep 99 or earlier.
The applicant's DOR to captain is 18 Jul 98; however, his name did not
appear on the list of eligible officers that was provided to his Military
Personnel Flight. The omission was not discovered until after the
established suspense date for submission of PRFs. Once discovered, his
senior rater accomplished a PRF and forwarded it for consideration.
Through no fault of his own, the applicant was not considered for promotion
to the grade of major by the FY04 PV board and it appears that every
reasonable effort was made to ensure his PRF was made available for
consideration by the selection board in question. Accordingly it is our
opinion that he should receive consideration by Special Review Board (SRB)
for promotion to the grade of major. Therefore, we recommend that his
records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be considered for promotion to the grade of major, Air Force
Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and his records be evaluated in
comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by
the Fiscal Year 2004 Air Force Reserve Major Position Vacancy Board, and if
recommended for promotion by the SRB, the Air Force Board for Correction of
Military Records be advised of that recommendation at the earliest
practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate actions may be
completed.
If he is not recommended for promotion by the SRB, the office of primary
responsibility advise him of the recommendation of the SRB.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 2003-
01058 in Executive Session on 3 Jun 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. George Franklin, Member
Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 4 Apr 03.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Apr 03, w/atchs.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01058
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be considered for promotion to the grade of major,
Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and his records be
evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not
selected by the Fiscal Year 2004 Air Force Reserve Major Position Vacancy
Board, and if recommended for promotion by the SRB, the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records be advised of that recommendation at the
earliest practicable date so that all necessary and appropriate actions may
be completed.
If he is not recommended for promotion by the SRB, the office of
primary responsibility advise him of the recommendation of the SRB.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00824
In this regard, we noted the statement from the applicant’s flight commander to HQ ARPC, which the senior rater concurred with, indicating that the applicant’s position vacancy promotion recommendation form (PV PRF) package was completed in a timely manner, but for several reasons was not processed by the published suspense date, resulting in the applicant being denied an opportunity for promotion consideration. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01059
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that while it spells out the actual policy and requirements for submission of PV nominations, adequate advanced notice was in fact not received by her senior rater and in turn the nomination and PRF was not submitted in a timely manner. Providing her consideration...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01688
The 624 RSG commander provides a supporting statement confirming she did submit the applicant for promotion but discovered, after the board results were released, that the package was never forwarded from 624 RSG/DPM to HQ ARPC. The applicant was date-of-rank (DOR) eligible for consideration by the FY05 Major PV selection board, but his name did not appear on the list of officers considered by this board. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-01688 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02641
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02641 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His position number (007130530) be changed to position number 00713050 and that be considered for a Position Vacancy (PV) promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF)...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-01559
DPB states the applicant was date of rank (DOR) eligible for consideration by the FY05 Major PV Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be considered for promotion to the grade of major, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and her records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not...
In regards to the additional PME requirement, the applicant states that the policy was not in effect at the time of her promotion board and she should not be evaluated against a higher standard than her peers meeting the same board. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form, AF Form 709, be considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 2003-02185 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for a position vacancy (PV) promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year 2004A (FY04A) Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Major PV Board. He was not considered for a PV promotion by the FY04 board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02866
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response indicating that as a result of administrative corrections to his position, he now has all the requirements to meet a position vacancy board: time in grade, a valid lieutenant colonel position, and the intent to nominate. Based on the assumption that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03190
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states consideration for the Major PV Selection Board is based on the receipt of the AF Form 709. The applicant’s senior rater, the sole nomination authority for the PV Selection Board, has not submitted documentation to support either an original nomination, or express support for the appeal request. The original packet was completed and submitted to the MPF on time.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00791
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) did not reach the Selection Board Secretariat in time to be considered for promotion by the U0405A board. The applicant provided a letter from his senior rater dated 2 Feb 04 explaining why the PRF was prepared and submitted late. We find no evidence of an error in this case and after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission, we do not believe he has...