RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03081
INDEX CODE: 137.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show that he elected to
participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She should be considered to receive an annuity under the Reserve
Component Survivor Benefit Plan. In support of her request, she
provides a statement from her son who contends that the couple planned
on using the military pension as part of their retirement, but the
former member died before they could enjoy their retirement together.
He says that the former member was not a bookkeeper and that he
intended to return the RCSBP form but he didn’t have the opportunity.
The former member drowned on 9 June 2001 while fishing with friends.
In support of her request, applicant provided a statement from her
son, a copy of a memorandum of Notification of Eligibility for Retired
Pay at Age 60 and Audit of Retirement Points, and her late husband's
Certificate of Death. Applicant's complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The former member was notified of his eligibility to participate in
the RCSBP when he first became eligible on 23 September 1999. The
election package was sent by certified mail and was signed for by Mrs.
Thomes on 22 October 1999. There is no evidence he made an election
at that time. Prior to 1 January 2001 by law, [Title 10 U.S.C., Sec.
1448(a)(2), which governs RCSBP, members must complete an election
within 90 days of receipt, otherwise the member would automatically be
enrolled in Option A, deferred election eligible to make an election
at age 60. The member died on 9 June 2001 at age 51.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPS reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. The
member had an opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage but failed to do so.
Mrs. Thomes is entitled to other benefits as the unremarried widow of
a retirement eligible member. She is eligible to utilize the
Commissary, Base Exchange and other base services. Upon the date in
which her husband would have turned age 60, the applicant will become
eligible to receive medical care through the TRICARE program. She may
also be eligible for benefit entitlements through the Veterans
Administration (VA). The DPS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6
December 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded
that the deceased member’s records should be altered so that his
surviving spouse will be eligible to receive an RCSBP annuity.
Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these
assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override
the rationale provided by the Air Force. We therefore agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
her burden of establishing that she has suffered either an error or an
injustice. In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03081
in Executive Session on 21 Jaunary 2003 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Daivd C. VanGasbeck, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Nov 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 27 Nov 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 02.
DAVID C. VANGASBECK
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03081
There is no evidence he made an election at that time. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of establishing that she has suffered either an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03081 in Executive Session on 21 Jaunary 2003 under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02540
While the applicant claims she was not aware her husband had chosen the immediate annuity option for RCSBP and that she received written correspondence stating she was not eligible for benefits until her husband’s 60th birthday, records indicate the member received an RCSBP package explaining in detail how the RCSBP permits a member to provide a monthly annuity to their designated beneficiaries in the event of their death. ...
The Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) information package sent to the former servicemember, when he was initially eligible to establish survivor coverage on the applicant’s behalf, specifically advised the member that his RCSBP election certificate had to be received by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) within 90 days of receipt of the package at his home. A review of the evidence submitted does not reveal that the deceased member was provided inadequate information...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel provided a response to the Air Force evaluation, which included another letter from the applicant, her son-in-law and a friend of the deceased military member. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01914
However, the section of law applicable to reserve component members in effect at the time the former member was eligible to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan did not require spousal notification if the member deferred making an election until age 60. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00348
She has learned since her husband’s death that this package was mailed as registered mail with a suspense date of 90 days, requiring an election of A, B, or C to determine her annuity. There is no evidence he made an RCSBP election at that time. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by thanking the Air Force for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01117
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. During the RCSBP open enrollment, March 1999 to 29 February 2000, records indicate that the member was notified but did not respond within the 90 days as required by law. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of having suffered either an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02163
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that the spouse of the former member is entitled to other benefits as the unremarried widow of a retirement eligible member. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The spouse of the former member states that a package was sent certified mail and signed for by...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03497
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She did not receive notification of her husband’s SBP election when he retired. Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03497 in Executive Session on 21 January 2003 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Panel Chair Ms....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00727 INDEX CODE 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be corrected so that she may be eligible for a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. She feels she is entitled to any and all benefits regarding her spouse, as this is what he would have chosen had he not been...