RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02373
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Applicant, through her son, requests that her late husband's records
be corrected so that she may be eligible for a Reserve Component
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When her husband received the RCSBP Election Certificate, he filled it
out opting for Option C, Immediate Coverage. Being a little confused
about what it meant, he called the Air National Guard Personnel Office
at Fairchild AFB because he wanted to be sure his spouse would receive
survivor benefits no matter what happened to him. The personnel
office incorrectly told him that only his wife could waive her
survivor benefits, implying that her benefits were in good order.
This led him to believe that he did not have to return the DD Form
1883 [sic]. He didn’t want to risk returning the form because it
could possibly confuse things and thought it best not to risk his
wife’s benefits by returning the form.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
The Directorate of Customer Assistance, HQ ARPC/DPS, recommended
denial. The member was notified of his eligibility to participate in
the RCSBP when he was first eligible on 5 May 1993. There is no
record of an election being made by the member.
During the 1999-2000 Open Enrollment Season (1 March 99 – 29 Feb 00),
member elected an RCSBP election for spouse only coverage. Title 10
U.S.C., Section 1448, clearly states that during an open season a
member must live at least two years from the date of election for the
plan to take effect. If the member dies prior to the two-year
effective date, then the election will be void and the RCSBP coverage
will revert to the previous election. Member’s election would have
been effective 29 Feb 02, however, he died on 31 Jan 01.
They state that the member’s son indicated that his father was told by
his personnel office that he did not need to complete the forms in
order to make an election under the RCSBP to provide an annuity for
his wife. However, the package that was sent to the deceased
applicant clearly states that, “If the completed election form (ARPC
FM 123) is not received at the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) or
postmarked within 90 days, you will be considered to have made an
election not to participate in the plan.” The package also contained
phone numbers to call if a person had any questions.
They further state that since the member completed over 20 years of
satisfactory service, there are benefits that the applicant would be
eligible for, such as, commissary, base exchange, services, medical
and dental coverage as long as she is not remarried. If she
remarries, she would no longer be eligible for these benefits unless
the marriage has ceased, either through death or divorce.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
The applicant submitted a response to the Air Force evaluation further
explaining the events leading up to the member’s retirement and
initial request for Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan. She
found fault in the evaluation’s analysis of the events that took place
during the member’s initial enrollment and subsequent enrollment
during the 1999-2000 Open Enrollment period.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded that her late husband’s records should be corrected so that
she may receive an SBP annuity. The Reserve Component Survivor
Benefit Plan (RCSBP) information package sent to the former
servicemember, when he was initially eligible to establish survivor
coverage on the applicant’s behalf, specifically advised the member
that his RCSBP election certificate had to be received by the Air
Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) within 90 days of receipt of the
package at his home. Additionally, the package included telephone
numbers at the ARPC to call should he have any questions about the
program. It was the member’s responsibility to contact that office to
verify any information he was unsure of. A review of the evidence
submitted does not reveal that the deceased member was provided
inadequate information concerning the Reserve Component Survivor
Benefit Program during that time. In regard to the member’s election
made under the open enrollment period, the law requires that a member
must live at least two years from the date of the election in order
for the election to take effect. This Board’s power is limited to
what is allowed by existing law. Therefore, we agree with the opinion
and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 20 November 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jul 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 27 Sep 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Oct 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Response, undated
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
There was no evidence that the service member made an election at that time. Therefore, based on the evidence provided they recommend denying the applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel provided a response to the Air Force evaluation, which included another letter from the applicant, her son-in-law and a friend of the deceased military member. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02163
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that the spouse of the former member is entitled to other benefits as the unremarried widow of a retirement eligible member. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The spouse of the former member states that a package was sent certified mail and signed for by...
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). The applicant contends that he was never notified that if he did not elect RCSBP coverage within the required timeframe that his coverage would be automatically enrolled under Option A. The applicant was notified on two occasions of his eligibility to enroll in RCSBP but did not elect coverage either time.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01714
They have no record the member made an election at either time. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The spouse of the former member states in October of 1991, the former member signed for the package explaining retirement benefits that he was to review and elect the option of coverage to be provided. She also read in the letter of 1 November 2002, that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02455
There is no evidence he made an election at that time. The applicant was sent an open enrollment letter to his home address during the RCSBP open enrollment season, 1 March 1999 to 28 February 2000. During the RCSBP open enrollment season from 1 March 1999 to 28 February 2000, records indicate the applicant was notified.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978
Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01117
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. During the RCSBP open enrollment, March 1999 to 29 February 2000, records indicate that the member was notified but did not respond within the 90 days as required by law. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of having suffered either an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00348
She has learned since her husband’s death that this package was mailed as registered mail with a suspense date of 90 days, requiring an election of A, B, or C to determine her annuity. There is no evidence he made an RCSBP election at that time. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by thanking the Air Force for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03751
A certified package notifying the servicemember of his eligibility to participate in RCSBP was sent to his home address and his wife signed for the package on 13 May 1994. ARPC has no record of receiving an election request from the servicemember. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...