RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03465
INDEX NUMBER: 123.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The 30 days time loss incurred while he was in pre-trial confinement be
removed from his records.
He be promoted to senior airman (SrA) effective 6 Dec 01 vice 5 Jan
02.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was placed in pre-trial confinement in Germany, while still on
leave, due to an outstanding warrant for his arrest. He was not aware
of the arrest warrant. The charges against him were dropped in Oct 01.
In support of his request, applicant provides a letter of evaluation
and reference prepared by the Host Nation (German) legal advisor.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is presently serving on active duty in the grade of airman
first class (A1C). He entered active duty on 23 Jun 99. His Total
Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD), due to 30 days lost
time, is 22 Jul 99.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPW recommends denial of the applicant’s request to restore his
time lost. They have attached a copy of a legal opinion prepared by
AFPC/JA that advises that the applicant’s request does not comply with
United States Code (USC), Section 972, Title 10.
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAO recommends denial of the applicant’s request to adjust
his TAFMSD and paydate. The applicant’s TAFMSD and paydate were
adjusted to reflect the time lost.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
HQ AFPC/DPPPWB recommends that the applicant’s date of rank (DOR) to
both A1C and SrA be adjusted accordingly if his request to restore lost
time is granted.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
5 April 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a
response has not been received.
_______________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Staff Judge Advocate (SJA)
referenced by the applicant as having knowledge of his case, provided a
statement to clarify the circumstances of the applicant’s case. She
provided the sequence of events, as she understood them to have
occurred. She asks the Board to favorably consider the applicant’s
appeal. She indicates that she truly believes that the applicant’s
incarceration was not due to his misconduct and should not be held
against him. The dismissal of all charges against the applicant is
strong evidence that criminal proceedings were not warranted.
The complete statement is at Exhibit G.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the complete evidence
of record, it appears that the applicant’s incarceration was due to a
series of administrative errors rather than misconduct on his part.
The statement from the Staff Judge Advocate, who had knowledge of the
unique circumstances in this case, indicates that the applicant is an
outstanding Air Force member and that the dismissal of all charges
against him is strong evidence that criminal proceedings were
unwarranted. While we note the legal opinion indicates that the
removal of lost time is a violation of the applicable law, we have been
subsequently informed that this Board has the authority to remove lost
time. In view of the above findings we recommend the lost time be
removed from applicant’s records. In addition, applicant’s Total
Active Federal Military Service Date, pay date, and promotion dates
should be adjusted. We also note that applicant requested the removal
of 30 days of lost time; however, it appears that he was actually
charged for 29 days. Therefore, we recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The period 3 April 2001 to 1 May 2001 was not lost time;
that all references thereto be deleted from his records; and, that he
is entitled to full pay and allowances during this period.
b. His Total Active Military Service Date and Pay Date is 23
June 1999.
c. His date of rank to the grade of airman first class is 6
August 1999.
d. He was promoted to the grade of senior airman effective and
with date of rank 6 December 2001.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 01-03465 in
Executive Session on 5 June 2002 and 27 June 2002, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Michael Maglio, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Nov 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPW, dated 25 Feb 02, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 11 Mar 02.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 15 Mar 02,
w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Apr 02.
Exhibit G. Memorandum, 469 ABG/JA, dated 21 Jun 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AFBCMR 01-03465
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show
that:
a. The period 3 April 2001 to 1 May 2001 was not lost
time; that all references thereto be, and hereby is, deleted from
his records; and, that he is entitled to full pay and allowances
during this period.
b. His Total Active Military Service Date and Pay Date
is 23 June 1999.
c. His date of rank to the grade of airman first class
is 6 August 1999.
d. He was promoted to the grade of senior airman
effective and with date of rank
6 December 2001.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPMAF2 recommends the application be denied. Since she did perform duty as an Assistant Executive Officer, for which she received a Joint Service Commendation Medal for her...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02352 INDEX CODE: 123.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The period of his service that was considered “lost time” be restored to his period of active service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPWR evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/JA indicated that even though the evidence clearly supports...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03769
The applicant was held in pretrial confinement from 11 November 2002 to 6 February 2003, causing a total lost time of 88 days. The Air Force also did not err in characterizing the time the applicant spent in pretrial confinement as lost time. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR reviewed the applicant’s request and states that upon entry to active duty, applicant’s DIEUS date was established in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, Table 1, Rule 13, giving the applicant a DIEUS of 21 July 1986, IAW his DD Form 4, dated 21 July 1986 (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03018 INDEX CODE: 111.02, 134.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: An expired Unfavorable Information File (UIF), with a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) be removed from her records; the line in Section V (Rater’s Comments) of her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), closing 23 Apr 99, which made the...
Evidence reflects that the applicant accumulated 9 months and 16 days of Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS) through his service with the Air Force Reserve and did not accumulate the 2 years TAFMS required to enlist in the Regular Air Force in the grade of E-4. Therefore, we are in complete agreement with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00850
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of E-3, with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 19 Apr 01. Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Date of Rank, stipulates that “Airmen in the following categories receive a DOR equal to the date of enlistment in the RegAF: Non-prior service enlistees (members who have served less than 24 months total active federal military service) or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03178
The approved body fat standard adjustment did not take place until after the failures and his promotion to the grade of master sergeant had already been rescinded. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was selected for promotion to the grade of master sergeant, but was rendered ineligible to assume the higher grade because of his failure to make satisfactory progress in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02283
AFPC/DPPAOR indicated the applicant was given credit for all of her active duty time and that her TAFMSD was correct (Exhibit D). EPRs are a record of performance while serving in the military, whether on active duty or in the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01543
His referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 30 Jan 03, be removed from his records. We note that regardless of his commander's action, the court-martial conviction and referral EPR rendered him ineligible for promotion. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the close-out date of his AF Form 910, Enlisted...