Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202551
Original file (0202551.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02551
            INDEX CODE 128.05
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust  and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
the SRB review had  not  been  announced  as  of  the  date  of  applicant’s
reenlistment.  Therefore, the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was  not  able
to brief the applicant that it had changed.

The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  30
August 2002 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the  evidence
of record and applicant’s submission,  we  are  not  persuaded  that  relief
should be granted.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however,  we  do
not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive  to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force.   The  office  of  primary
responsibility has  adequately  addressed  applicant’s  contentions  and  we
agree with their opinion and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis  for
our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain  his  burden  that  he
has suffered either an error or an injustice.  Hence, we find no  compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  02-02551  in
Executive Session on 23 October 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                       Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
                       Mr. James E. Short, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Jul 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 21 Aug 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 02.


                                   ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02551

    Original file (BC-2002-02551.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the SRB review had not been announced as of the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200680

    Original file (0200680.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200983

    Original file (0200983.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202175

    Original file (0202175.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 26 Jul 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02955

    Original file (BC-2002-02955.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02955 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 14 Jan 02 be changed to 17 Jan 02. The window to get the SRB recomputed was if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02 and had a DOS of 17 Jan 02 or later. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01768

    Original file (BC-2002-01768.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time she was released, she took her end of course exams twice and failed both times due to working 12 hour days and suffering a miscarriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202124

    Original file (0202124.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. However, we have been advised by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) that the applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was affected by the STOP LOSS program which was in effect at the time. Therefore, had he not reenlisted in December 2001, he would not have been allowed to separate on January 13, 2002; rather, an extension of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200238

    Original file (0200238.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003117

    Original file (0003117.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the information he received from the MPF, on 16 Aug 00, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years. The applicant states, and we believe, that he based his decision to reenlist on his entitlement to receive the SRB. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03317 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200188

    Original file (0200188.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. After reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we are persuaded that some relief is warranted. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00188 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...