Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00350
Original file (BC-2004-00350.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00350
            INDEX NUMBER: 100.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Date of Initial Entry to Uniformed  Services  (DIEUS)  be  changed  from
19 December 1980 to 25 August 1980, or in the alternative,  his  records  be
corrected to show that he falls under the retirement  plan  of  final  basic
pay as established under Title 10 Section 1407.

_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to administrative delays in  processing  his  Reserve  Officer  Training
Corps (ROTC) scholarship, his DIEUS date is 19  December  1990.   The  DIEMS
date is used to determined the retirement plan a member  falls  under.   The
error in his DIEUS date places him  in  a  less  than  favorable  retirement
plan.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a letter from his former  AFROTC
Detachment Commander indicating that administrative delays resulted  in  the
late processing of the applicant’s scholarship contract.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant  contracted  his  enlistment  in  the  Air  Force  Reserve  on
19 December 1980, for a period  of  eight  years.   He  was  commissioned  a
second lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve on 7 December 1984,  and  entered
active duty on 15 December 1985.

_________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAO recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
the applicant’s DIEUS date was  established  correctly  upon  his  entry  to
active duty.

The AFPC/DPPAO evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The evaluation does not cite the  correct  regulation  and  used  Air  Force
directives to justify their recommendation to deny his  application.   Undue
consideration or weight should not be placed on the  evaluation  since  they
have no power or authority to  deviate  from  Air  Force  regulations.   The
Secretary  of  Defense  acknowledges  that  some  individuals  have   unique
situations that complicate determining their DIEUS.   One  of  the  specific
examples given is beginning an ROTC scholarship program.  He began the  ROTC
program when he complied with all the conditions listed in  the  scholarship
offer letter and enrolled in the ROTC on  25 August  1980.   While  the  Air
Force normally used the DIEUS date to establish the retirement formula,  the
ROTC contract he signed establishes that he is entitled  to  the  retirement
plan prescribed by law and regulation as of the day  he  started  his  first
term of college work.  In his  case,  these  dates  are  not  the  same  and
materially affect the retirement plan he falls under.  The Air  Force  could
have reasonably been expected to have  the  scholarship  contract  ready  on
this date had there not been any administrative delays.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  In this respect,  we  note  the  DIEUS  is
established  based  on  the  date  of  initial  acceptance  of   commission,
appointment, or enlistment in any branch of the  armed  forces,  to  include
enlistment as a Reserve in the Senior ROTC program.  The DIEUS  is  used  to
determine, among other things, what retirement plan a  member  falls  under.
The applicant contends that administrative delays resulted  in  his  receipt
of a DIEUS  that  will  render  him  ineligible  for  the  final  basic  pay
retirement plan established  in  Section  1407,  United  States  Code.   The
evidence of record  indicates  that  applicant  complied  with  all  of  the
conditions listed in the ROTC scholarship offer letter and enrolled  in  the
AFROTC on 25 August 1980.  However, he was  unable  to  execute  his  AFROTC
enlistment until 19 December 1980.   Applicant’s  former  AFROTC  Detachment
Commander states the delay in processing  of  applicant’s  ROTC  scholarship
contract was due to  medical  emergencies  and  marital  problems  occurring
within  the  AFROTC  detachment  personnel.   In  view  of  the  commander’s
statement and since the delay was through no fault of applicant, we  do  not
believe he should  be  penalized.   Therefore,  we  recommend  his  Date  of
Initial Entry to Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be adjusted to 25 August 1980.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected  to  show  that  his  Date  of  Initial  Entry  to
Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be established as 25 August 1980, rather than  19
December 1980.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2004-00350
in Executive Session on 21 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
                       Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 8 Mar 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Mar 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Mar 04




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

AFBCMR BC-2004-00350




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that his Date of Initial
Entry to Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be, and hereby is, established as 25
August 1980, rather than 19 December 1980.









JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02517

    Original file (BC-2002-02517.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he agrees with AFPC’s summary of his basis for request except for their final statement, “…there was a delay in signing the required paperwork needed to make the correction to his DIEUS.” He states, actually, there was an AFROTC-induced delay in processing his four-year scholarship award delaying his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01454

    Original file (BC-2010-01454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFROTC/CC evaluation is at Exhibit D. Holm Center/JA recommends deny, stating, in part, changing the date of contracting via the DD Form 4 signed in 1980 will not affect the date the applicant entered Federal service, that date is the day he was commissioned in 1982. In addition, active Federal service does not begin at the time the AF Form 1056, AFROTC contract and associated DD Form 4 is signed, but rather upon commissioning. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201673

    Original file (0201673.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon entry to active duty the DIEUS date was established as 13 May 1986 in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, 1 July 1999, Table 1, Rule 13 and the applicant’s DD Form 4, 13 May 1986. The term "date entered service" means the date the person is enlisted, inducted or appointed...not TAFMSD. By signing a contract prior to 1 August 1986, the member’s retirement pay plan was, is and always will be “High-3”…the MRRA didn’t affect the member.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03707

    Original file (BC-2011-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retired pay be calculated under the Final Basic Pay retirement plan rather than the High-36 retirement pay plan and his debt be removed. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, stating, in part, there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00334

    Original file (BC-2004-00334.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFOATS/JA states that the applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate his request and that it appears that he tried to play the waiting game for his best personal options and in a time crunch chose to accept the HPSP. The applicant did not apply for the educational delay within 90 days of the projected commissioning date; therefore, the detachment commander did not abuse his authority by not accepting the application, advises AFOATS/JA. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101056

    Original file (0101056.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other documents in his record completed on his entry into the Air Force are dated 6 Sep 80. He believes it is rational to conclude that he would have signed the Addendum to AF Form 1056 at the same time he signed the AF Form 1056 itself. This document shows the applicant’s first enlistment as an Air Force Reserve member was on 8 Sep 80.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02743

    Original file (BC 2013 02743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02743 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFROTC records indicate that he received POCI funds, which was confirmed in his request as well. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03694

    Original file (BC-2003-03694.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03694 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) date be changed to August 1980. A copy of the applicant's submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00319

    Original file (BC-2004-00319.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00319 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 7 February 1986 to 11 September 1986. On 7 May 2002, he received notification that due to problems with the military personnel data system at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00623

    Original file (BC-2004-00623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 September 1993, the applicant signed an AF Form 1056, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Contract. Congress purposely made ROTC graduates ineligible for the MGIB in its effort to prevent individuals from receiving “double” benefits. She further indicates if she received scholarship monies she would have received between $6,000.00 and $12,000.00 per year.