RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00541
INDEX CODE: 135.03
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
SSN HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect that he was not an unsatisfactory
driller in the Air Force Reserve (AFR).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not an unsatisfactory driller. He was processed out of the Air
Force for non-successful completion of technical school. He never
missed any drills in which he was scheduled to participate.
He was not aware of this discrepancy in his record until he was denied
Montgomery GI Bill-Selected Reserve (MGIB-SR) benefits.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the AFR on 13 Feb 92, as an airman basic for
a period of six years. He successfully completed Basic Military
Training/Tech School on 6 Nov 92 and was eligible for MGIB-SR
benefits.
On 5 Mar 95, the applicant was terminated from the AFR for
unsatisfactory participation. He was reassigned to the Individual
Ready Reserve on 26 May 95 for nonparticipation. He joined the Navy
Reserve on 13 Feb 02.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/DPT states the applicant was inactive for almost 5 years. His
point history shows no activity past 7-8 Jan 95. In accordance with
DoDI 1322.17, paragraph 6.8.1, entitlement to
MGIB-SR benefits shall be suspended on the date the service member
fails to participate satisfactorily as determined by the Command
authority. Failure to participate satisfactorily is defined as
failure to fulfill the contractual obligation or service agreement as
a member of the Selected Reserve.
Reserve members are authorized one 12 month nonavailability break
during the 10-year window of MGIB eligibility. The member's MGIB
eligibility can be reinstated if the member, within one year,
reenlists or extends for the period of time he did not actively
participate in the Selected Reserve. The applicant is not eligible
for MGIB benefits because he had a break of more than 12 months.
Based on the above information, they recommend denying the applicant's
request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5
Apr 02, for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00541 in Executive Session on May 22, 2002, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Feb 02, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/DPT, dated 27 Mar 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Apr 02.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01764 INDEX CODE:135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His personnel record reflect satisfactory participation in the Air Force Reserve. AFRC/DPM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPT recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ The...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01764 INDEX CODE:135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His personnel record reflect satisfactory participation in the Air Force Reserve. AFRC/DPM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPT recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00661
In May 95, the Air Force Medical Review Board determined that he was medically disqualified for worldwide duty. By letter, dated 6 Feb 03, the Board’s staff requested that the applicant provide any and all pertinent records that he had in his possession, as well as any medical documentation from any private physicians who may have provided him medical treatment (Exhibit E). The Medical Consultant noted that the applicant’s heart attack triggered medical disqualification by the Air Force Reserve.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01178
On 2 December 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force for a period of six years. He was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard on 1 September 1995. Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFRC/DPM again reviewed this application and stated that the applicant was demoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4) because of unsatisfactory performance.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01632
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01632 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect that he was discharged due to a medical condition, rather than unsatisfactory performance. The Medical Consultant's evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRSP recommends denial....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02110
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPMB advises that enlisted personnel who are projected for promotion while on active duty do not carry that projected promotion to the Air Force Reserve. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his active duty projected promotion should be transferred to the Reserve. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
He received an RE Code of 2B, which defined means "Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10 with a general discharge or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.” Applicant's discharge case file is not in his military personnel records; therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot be verified. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00309 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to permit his participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) and remain eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) during this enlistment. Although the applicant can participate in the CLRP...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00148
DPT states the applicant’s record should be corrected to show a break in service from 16 Oct 99 through 9 Jan 06. By removing the additional ISLRS time, her TFCSD, Total Years Service Date (TYSD), and Pay Date would also be adjusted by 6 years, 2 months and 24 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: discharged from...