RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00309
INDEX NUMBER: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to permit his participation in the College
Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) and remain eligible for the
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) during this enlistment.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Upon his enlistment, his Air Force Recruiter informed him that he
would receive both the MGIB and the CLRP, the latter being in the
form of $10,000 in student loan repayments, to be paid by the USAF,
to his student loan creditors.
The applicant’s statement and documentary evidence submitted in
support of his application are included as Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 19 September 2000
with the understanding he could participate in both the CLRP and
MGIB during his current enlistment. He accepted the automatic MGIB
enrollment on 17 October 2000. Subsequently, he was told he could
participate in both at the same time, then later that he had to
choose between the programs and, finally, that eligibility for both
programs could only be established in separate enlistments. He
currently has over $10,000 in college loans.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/DPDE recommends approval. That office states that they
were not aware when it activated CLRP that Section 3033 of 38 USC,
Chapter 30, prohibits the Department of Veterans Affairs from using
the same enlistment to qualify an individual for both CLRP and MGIB
benefits. They learned of this several months later and took
action to notify Recruiting Service and Basic Military Training
personnel that trainees could have one of the two programs. This
problem was eased on 1 November 2000, when the President signed
Public Law 106-419 amending 38 USC, Chapter 30. This change allows
an individual to qualify and participate in the CLRP during his or
her first enlistment and use a subsequent enlistment to qualify for
the MGIB. They then took action to again correct what is told to
recruits and trainees.
An individual desiring the MGIB must, within 14 days of entering
active duty, make an irrevocable election to participate and have
his or her pay reduced by $1200 during the first year of such
service although the service required for eligibility must be
established in a subsequent enlistment. This creates a problem
where an individual at Basic Military Training must elect and pay
for the MGIB while not knowing if he or she will ever reenlist.
HQ USAF/DPDE further states that the CLRP changes, coupled with the
short time in which they had to begin accepting applications,
created serious information dissemination and procedures problems.
Many individuals, including the applicant, were told they could
enlist for the program but problems resulted in the program
eligibility statement not being included on the enlistment
contract. Although the applicant can participate in the CLRP at
this time and later establish eligibility for the MGIB, he was
misled into thinking he could qualify for both programs during this
enlistment. The applicant is one of approximately 476 individuals
who were given the erroneous information. Of these, 296 have yet
to have a CLRP payment made on their behalf.
Since payment of college loans would negate applicant’s eligibility
for the MGIB, the only way to provide relief without violating the
applicable law is to direct compensation to the applicant (Exhibit
C).
HQ USAF/JAG states, among other things, that obviously the Board
does not have the authority to give applicant a lump sum payment.
However, given the injustice of the situation, that office has no
objection to the Board fashioning an appropriate form of equitable
relief (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the advisory opinions were made available to the
applicant for review and comment in accordance with established
policy.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed
as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the
victim of either an error or an injustice. Since we lack the
authority to direct an outright payment, we are compelled to come
up with a creative correction that will compensate the applicant as
though he had remained eligible to participate in the CLRP as
promised. Accordingly, we direct that the applicant’s records be
corrected to the extent set forth below.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DIRECTS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was authorized by competent authority and performed 36
days of temporary duty (TDY) during the period 26 July 2002 through
31 August 2002 at Port Hope, Alaska.
b. He did not enroll into the College Loan Repayment Program
(CLRP).
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 13 September 2002 under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
Ms. Brenda Romine, Member
Mr. Mack M. Burton, Executive Director (non-voting)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AF/DPDE, dated 4 Jun 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AF/JAG, dated 20 Aug 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 02.
ROSCOE HINTON JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00309
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured
compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
is announced, and it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [applicant], be corrected to show that:
a. He was authorized by competent authority and
performed 36 days of temporary duty (TDY) during the period 26 July
2002 through 31 August 2002 at Port Hope, Alaska.
b. He did not enroll into the College Loan Repayment
Program (CLRP).
MACK M. BURTON
Executive Director
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02775
Applicant completed AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force, on 12 Aug 03, acknowledging that he had been briefed on the CLRP and that he permanently waived his CLRP enrollment option. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterated his original contentions that he was misled at the MEPS station. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03574
___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, provided he meets the eligibility criteria for participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP), on 4 November 2002, he elected to participate in that program rather than the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02341
However, in-depth information is provided after entry on active duty that correctly addresses the program and eligibility. His AF Form 3008 does state MGIB disenrollment is required to participate in CLRP; however, the lecture at BMT and the BMT student guide correct any inaccurate statements or information provided to the applicant prior to entry on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02257
After reviewing the evidence of record, we believe the applicant has been the victim of an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, provided he meets the eligibility criteria for participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP), on 9 July 2002, he elected to participate in that program rather than the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00737
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00737 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to permit his participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) and remain eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). If the Board grants the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02497
At the time of his enlistment processing he was not made aware that a CLRP enrollment statement must be included with his contract to be eligible for the program. After reviewing the evidence of record, we do believe the applicant has been the victim of an injustice. ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02497 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02273
The law requires a person who receives benefits under the CLRP program to also have a second period of service to qualify for MGIB. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01816
The applicant’s records reflect he declined participation in the MGIB on 1 August 2000 and acknowledged he would not be able to enroll in the MGIB at a later date. The law stipulates that all MGIB eligible individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active duty and are given a one-time opportunity to disenroll should they desire not to participate in the program. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence which shows to our...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00973
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states the ECLRP is an enlistment incentive where the Air Force assists individuals by repaying a portion of their outstanding federal student loans. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02803
After reviewing the evidence of record, we do believe the applicant has been the victim of an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, provided he meets the eligibility criteria for participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP), on 30 October 2002, he elected to participate in that program rather than...