Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200529
Original file (0200529.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00529
                       INDEX CODE:  135.03
      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN        HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His effective  date of duty be  changed from 3  February  2002  to  15
January 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was asked to come to the  Space  and  Missile  Systems  Center  for
possible job placement on 15 January 2002.  He was advised to  consult
the employment office for possible early activation.  The NCOIC in the
employment office assured him that he could  begin  active  duty  that
day.  Based on this information he quit his civilian job and  reported
for duty on 15 January 2002.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFMPC/DPPAO states block 13 on the applicant's  Extended  Active  Duty
Orders (AF Form 766) has his effective date of duty as on or  after  3
February 2002 and that he should report to Los Angeles AFB,  no  later
than 2400 hours on that date.   Based  on  the  information  provided,
DPPAO recommends denying the applicant's request.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5
April 2002, for review and response.  As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After reviewing the evidence of
record, it appears that the applicant's appointment in the Air  Force
Reserve was on 12 January 2002 and he was notified to report for  in-
processing on 15 January 2002.   While  applicant's  extended  active
duty orders reflect he was to report on 3 February 2002, we note  the
orders in question were issued on 31  July  2001.   In  view  of  the
evidence of record, we believe that the applicant's request should be
approved.  Therefore, we recommend his records be  corrected  to  the
extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show he entered active duty on 15
January 2002, rather than 3 February 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00529 in Executive Session on 22 May 2002, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:

                       Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                       Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
                       Ms. Martha Maust, Member

All members voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, dated 25 Mar 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Apr 02.




                       ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
                       Panel Chair






AFBCMR 02-00529



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

            Having received and considered the recommendation of the
Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that he entered
extended active duty on 15 January 2002, rather than 3 February 2002.




                       JOE G. LINEBERGER
                       Director
                       Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200638

    Original file (0200638.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is requesting service credit for 1 year, 2 months of enlisted service. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force Evaluation and states his service record does not reflect his date of initial entry into uniformed service. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103594

    Original file (0103594.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ USAF/JAG states the applicant served exactly four years on active duty as an enlisted member. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant did not meet the requirement of having served on active duty as an enlisted member for over 4 years to be eligible to receive O-1E pay.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201910

    Original file (0201910.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01910 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 8 Jul 84 to 20 Jul 83. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 02. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01910 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201649

    Original file (0201649.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR 02-01649 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201673

    Original file (0201673.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon entry to active duty the DIEUS date was established as 13 May 1986 in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, 1 July 1999, Table 1, Rule 13 and the applicant’s DD Form 4, 13 May 1986. The term "date entered service" means the date the person is enlisted, inducted or appointed...not TAFMSD. By signing a contract prior to 1 August 1986, the member’s retirement pay plan was, is and always will be “High-3”…the MRRA didn’t affect the member.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200517

    Original file (0200517.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no provisions in the law at that time to notify spouses if the servicemember did not elect coverage. There is no evidence that the servicemember elected SBP during any of the authorized open enrollments. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200541

    Original file (0200541.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00541 INDEX CODE: 135.03 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was not an unsatisfactory driller in the Air Force Reserve (AFR). On 5 Mar 95, the applicant was terminated from the AFR for unsatisfactory participation. The member's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201383

    Original file (0201383.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Mr. Clarence D. Long III, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered this application on 10 July 2002. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 13 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01383 INDEX CODE:...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03593

    Original file (BC-2003-03593.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His time in service dates were adjusted by the four months and five days of his break in service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAO recommended denial indicating that the time frame from when the applicant was discharged to the time he returned to active duty was less than two years, which entitled him to 50 percent of his time in grade as a staff sergeant. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAO evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200797

    Original file (0200797.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00797 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...