RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00483
INDEX NUMBER: 134.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His promotion test scores for 1973 show zeroes, as he was unable to
test.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPWB reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation by reiterating that
he requests that his test scores for the 1973 promotion cycle show
zeros as he wasn’t allowed to test. The applicant indicates that his
records reflect scores of 66 on both the PFE and SKT for 1972 and 1973.
He asks, rhetorically, what are the odds of this happening. The
applicant further indicates that the Air Force should be able to find
enough information to verify or deny the validity of his claim.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00483 in
Executive Session on 5 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Michael Maglio, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 11 Mar 02,
W/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Mar 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 May 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
The close-out date of his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 3 Jun 98 through 14 Jan 99 be changed to reflect a date prior to 30 Dec 98. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00735 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reinstatement of his Promotion Sequence Number (PSN) 11276.0 for Cycle 99E5 to staff sergeant (E-5), promotions effective Sep 99 - Aug 00. He had completed a total of 5 years and 11 months and was serving in the grade of E-4 at the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00117
The EPR was rated an overall “4” which indicates, “ready for promotion,” and sections 5 and 6 of the EPR provide promotion comments. Air Force policy is that an evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of record. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 4 April 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02076 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 13 July 1999 through 31 May 2000, be removed from his records and he be provided supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) for the 01E5...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03028 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 29 Feb 00 to 2 Nov 97, his DOR when he served in the Air National Guard (ANG); his extended active duty (EAD) date reflect 2 Mar 99 vice 29 Feb 00, and his Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS) tests...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03678
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant opines that, if the applicant’s aortic valve is verified as normal based on repeat evaluation, the applicant’s request should be approved. The HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB stated that, as a result of the applicant’s enlistment in the grade of airman basic on 22 Sep 99, she would have met the minimum six months time-in-grade (TIG) requirement for promotion to airman (E-2) on 22 Mar 00, and the 10 months TIG requirement for promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00596 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of chief master sergeant (CMSgt) for cycle 02E9. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03465
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends denial of the applicant’s request to restore his time lost. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB recommends that the applicant’s date of rank (DOR) to both A1C and SrA be adjusted accordingly if his request to restore lost time is granted. In view of the above findings we recommend the lost time be removed from applicant’s records.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00213
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00213 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 July 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be considered for supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of chief master sergeant (CMSgt) (E-9) for promotion cycles 06E9. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02019 INDEX CODE: 131.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be retroactively promoted to the grade of E-9. In November 1957, he was told, by word of mouth, that his base commander had received a message from personnel at Andersen AFB stating that he had been instructed not to hand-carry his...