RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01834
INDEX NUMBER: 113.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her total active service and her date of rank (DOR) be corrected.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial.
Applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve, on
1 Nov 00, in the grade of E-4, with an effective date/date of rank
(DOR) of 23 Feb 93. On 2 Nov 00, applicant enlisted in the Regular
Air Force as an E-3, and was given a DOR equal to her date of
enlistment (DOE).
AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, is the governing
directive for computing dates of ranks. It states airmen who have
never served in a regular component will receive a DOR equal to their
DOE.
Applicant’s DOR was computed in a consistent, fair and equitable
manner according to her enlistment contract and governing directives.
She initialed and signed the contract, indicating she understood her
DOR would be equal to her DOE.
In addition, applicant was advised to contact the Ohio Army National
Guard for any corrections to her total active military service date
(TAFMSD). The Air Force credited her for all active duty points as
provided by the Ohio Army National Guard. Her TAFMSD was established
as 29 Dec 98.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
21 Sep 01 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 March 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 13 Sep 01 and
HQ AFPC/DPPAOR, dated 14 Dec 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Sep 01.
PHILIP SHEUERMAN
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02836 INDEX NUMBER: 1112.0 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlistment date of rank (DOR) of 6 May 1998 be changed to reflect he received one-half of the time in grade (TIG) credit from his previous Active Duty tour. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02761
DPPAES states that according to AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank (DOR), section B, paragraph 8.1, “Airmen in the following categories receive a DOR equal to their date of enlistment in the RegAF: Non-prior service enlistees (members who have less than 24 months total active federal service).” Furthermore, section B, paragraph 8.2 states, “if enlistment grade was not held in a regular component, DOR will be equal to the date of enlistment.” Denial recommendation is based on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03428
He requested a new retirement date of 1 Jul 03. First, he states that the cause of the “glitch” is blamed on his retirement date cancellation not making it through the system in time, when the fact is, regardless of whether he cancelled his retirement date, he was under Stop Loss and was eligible to compete for promotion, so his retirement flowing through the system should not have mattered. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01882 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 25 Mar 99 through 24 Mar 00 be declared void and removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00850
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of E-3, with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 19 Apr 01. Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Date of Rank, stipulates that “Airmen in the following categories receive a DOR equal to the date of enlistment in the RegAF: Non-prior service enlistees (members who have served less than 24 months total active federal military service) or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02964
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02964 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 6 Feb 01 to 1 Jan 96, his DOR when he served in the U.S. Army. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority believes that it is not unreasonable to believe that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01578 INDEX CODE: 110.00; 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or, entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed; and the narrative reason...
Although the JSAM was not reflected on the OSB, the citation was on file in the OSR and, therefore, present for the board’s consideration. The Air Force acknowledges that while the JSAM was not reflected on applicant’s OSB, the citation was a part of her selection record that was reviewed by the promotion board. It is highly unlikely this was the cause of her nonselection since central boards evaluate the entire officer record.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03426
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03426 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4E be changed to a code that will enable him to reenlist and that his grade of senior airman (SrA/E-4) be reinstated. The applicant’s assigned RE code of 4E accurately reflects that he...
He was medically cleared on 7 Aug 00 and enlisted in the RegAF on 5 Sep 00 in the grade of SSgt (E-5) with a DOR of 5 Sep 00. The applicant’s enlistment was processed in a timely manner and his DOR correctly established to equal his 5 Sep 00 enlistment date. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis...