RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02007
INDEX CODE: 122.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The lumbo-sacral sprain, with lower extremities numbness, caused when
he slipped in front of his work center and fell to the floor,
resulting in his incapacitation, be determined to be in the line of
duty (LOD).
He be provided all benefits that he has been denied pursuant to ANGI
36-2910 and ANGI 36-3001, including incapacitation pay and allowances,
disability compensation and hospitalization benefits by the Veteran’s
Administration, reimbursement of medical expenses already incurred,
and payment of future medical expenses.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was in a duty status at the time he was injured. Therefore, a
determination should have been made that his injury was LOD.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded
statement, and the LOD determination and medical documentation, to
include a statement from an anesthesiologist.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Available documentation indicates that the applicant enlisted in the
Air National Guard (ANG) on 6 Apr 88 for a period of six years.
On 28 Dec 98, the applicant, a member of the Puerto Rico Air National
Guard (PRANG), was medically disqualified for Worldwide duty due to a
coronary condition. On 16 Mar 99, the applicant was given a physical
profile for aetherosclerosis cardio-vascular disease and was
restricted from performing any military duty. However, the applicant
was not removed from a duty status and continued to perform PRANG
related duties.
On 22 Jun 99, while walking toward the break area in front of his work
center, he slipped on gravel and fell to the floor landing in a
sitting position, resulting in a lumbo-sacral sprain with lower
extremities numbness.
On 1 Oct 99, the Commander, 156 Medical Squadron, PRANG, certified
that the applicant had been declared incapacitated to perform normal
military duty and recommended that a determination be made that his
injury was LOD.
On 29 Nov 99, the applicant was honorably discharged from the PRANG
under the provisions of AFI 36-3209 (Not Eligible for Worldwide
Deployment/Medical Disqualification).
On 23 Dec 99, the applicant’s commander recommended that a formal LOD
investigation be conducted. The recommendation was forwarded to the
appointing authority who provided it to the reviewing authority
without comment on the recommendation for a formal investigation.
By Special Order EK-2205, dated 26 Jan 00, the applicant was relieved
from his current assignment and assigned to the Retired Reserve
Section and his name was placed on the Reserve Retired List, effective
30 Nov 99. He was credited with 26 years, 7 months, and 7 days of
satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
On 2 Mar 00, the reviewing authority forwarded the LOD determination
to the approving authority, but it was returned without action.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ANG/DPFP recommended denial. ANG/DPFP noted the applicant’s claim
that he injured his spine after he was found medically disqualified
for continued service. ANG/DPFP indicated that from the medical
documentation included in the case file, and a previous review of his
medical record, it is apparent that the degenerative changes noted
were evident long before his claim of an injury in Jun 99. In
addition, the LOD that was returned without action was due to the fact
that when a member is found medically disqualified, any future claims
for LOD are not required nor allowed by law. The applicant’s lumbo
sacral sprain, with lower extremities numbness injury existed prior to
service.
A complete copy of the ANG/DPFP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant indicated that if he was on active duty
orders on the date of his injury, received active duty pay and
benefits for said day of work, was legally performing sensitive
military duties as a military member and not as a civilian, he
believes he is legally entitled to a LOD determination and should not
have to pay for the mistakes of the system which now wants to deprive
him of his rights in his time of need.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/JAG recommended that the Board either request that ANGSC/SG
respond to the deficiencies noted in their advisory or request that
the Secretary direct ANGSC/SG to complete the applicant’s LOD
determination as required by law and regulation. They would expect
that in doing so, an explanation would be obtained as to the
applicant’s medical disqualification in Dec 98, his duty status at the
time of his injury in Jun 99, and whether the applicant’s injury
should be considered EPTS. As part of this process, the applicant
should be given an opportunity to submit a statement in accordance
with 10 U.S.C. 1219. Upon completion of the LOD determination, the
Board may then consider the applicant’s request for relief, if
warranted.
A complete copy of the HQ USAF/JAG evaluation is at Exhibit F.
ANG/DPFP indicated that after an additional review of the applicant’s
medical documentation, and based on the fact that the applicant was
injured while on duty, even though he was disqualified medically for
duty in Dec 98, the applicant should have been found LOD-Yes for his
spinal injury. The state did not discharge the member for 11 months
after medical disqualification, based on the coronary condition, by
ANG/SG and NGB.
A complete copy of the ANG/DPFP evaluation is at Exhibit G.
The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, recommended denial. The Medical
Consultant indicated that perhaps the most compelling evidence against
eligibility for disability processing comes from the applicant’s own
words in which he states he “was put on sick call, receiving medical
treatment at Fort Buchanan Clinic. I continued to work until 30 Sec,
99 when my military orders ended and they were not extended.” This
evidence that he was able to continue to work until his orders expired
appears to substantiate the fact that he was not incapacitated for
performance of his duties (which should have been curtailed months
before, anyway, had his prior disqualification been acted upon
appropriately), and, therefore, not a candidate for consideration in
the disability evaluation system. Such consideration, of course,
depends on a member’s being unable to perform his assigned duties, a
situation that clearly did not exist in this case. There appears to
be no question, however, that the injury was sustained while on active
duty (albeit duty that should have been curtailed some months prior)
and that further care in the Department of Veterans Affairs system for
this service-incurred, but militarily not unfitting condition, is
appropriate given the circumstances leading to the injury. The
Medical Consultant stated that it is somewhat unclear to him how the
applicant continued to serve his period of active duty once he was
found to be medically disqualified. The simple physical finding of
his disqualification should have brought at least a verbal order to
curtail further military duties pending receipt of the “official”
notification that arrived almost a year later. Favorable
consideration of this request, other than to approve future DVA care
for the service-incurred medical condition, cannot be supported. The
BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the
records is warranted.
A complete of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 15
Nov 01 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit I).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice regarding the applicant’s
request that his spinal injury be determined to be in the line of duty
and that he be reimbursed for his incurred medical expenses. After an
exhaustive review of the facts and circumstances of this case, we are
sufficiently persuaded that a determination should have been made that
the applicant’s injury was incurred while in the line of duty, and
that he should be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses he
incurred for medical care resulting from his injury. Accordingly, we
recommend that his records be corrected as set forth below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice concerning the
applicant’s request for incapacitation pay and allowances, disability
compensation, and payment of future medical expenses.
a. With regard to the applicant’s request for incapacitation
pay and allowances, we note that the purpose of incapacitation pay is
to compensate an individual who experiences incapacitation or loss of
civilian earnings as a result of illness, injury, or disease incurred
or aggravated in the line of duty, and to provide the required medical
care associated with the incapacitation. After a thorough review of
the available evidence, nothing has been provided which convinces us
that the applicant was physically disabled as a result of his injury,
or was unable to perform duty subsequent to his injury. Furthermore,
he has not provided any documentation to show that he suffered any
loss of civilian earnings. In view of this, and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to act favorably
on the applicant’s request.
b. Concerning the applicant’s request for disability
compensation, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. No evidence has been presented which shows that the
applicant was considered unfit to perform the duties of his rank and
office as a result of his spinal injury. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the requested relief.
c. We note the applicant’s request that he received payment for
future medical expenses. However, since a determination has been made
that his injury was in the line of duty, and thus is considered a
service-incurred condition, we believe the DVA is the appropriate
agency to address this matter. Accordingly, the applicant’s request
is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that a Line of Duty (LOD)
Determination was initiated on 22 Jun 99 because of his injury of
lumbo-sacral sprain with lower extremities numbness and competent
authority thereafter determined that his injury was incurred while in
the Line of Duty; and, that he is entitled to reimbursement for any
medical expenses he incurred as a result of his injury prior to his
name being placed on the Reserve Retired List on 30 Nov 99.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 00-
02007 in Executive Session on 6 Mar 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jul 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 11 Jun 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 6 Jul 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, applicant, dated 5 Aug 01.
Exhibit F. Letter, HQ USAF/JAG, dated 17 Sep 01.
Exhibit G. Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 1 Nov 01.
Exhibit H. Letter, Medical Consultant, dated 13 Nov 01.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Nov 01.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-02007
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that a Line of Duty (LOD)
Determination was initiated on 22 Jun 99 because of his injury of
lumbo-sacral sprain with lower extremities numbness and competent
authority thereafter determined that his injury was incurred while in
the Line of Duty; and, that he is entitled to reimbursement for any
medical expenses he incurred as a result of his injury prior to his
name being placed on the Reserve Retired List on 30 Nov 99.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02850
He contends that he has been incapacitated since Jan 98 and should have received incapacitation pay from 7 Apr 98, after his active duty status was terminated, until 22 May 01, his date of separation from the ANG. We note that in Oct 98, some nine months after he was injured, an LOD was conducted regarding the applicant’s knee injuries certifying he was incapacitated, resulting in his entitlement to incapacitation pay for the period 7 Oct 98 to 30 Mar 99. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03048 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02, 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Special Order A1-175, dated 19 Aug 99, honorably discharging him from the Puerto Rico Air National Guard (PRANG) on 19 Aug 99 be invalidated. On 21 March 00, pursuant to its authority over federal labor/management...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00273
On 17 July 2002, he wrote a letter to his wing commander asking that an MEB be accomplished, that he be returned to active duty and entered into the Disability Evaluation System (DES), that he be provided all back pay to the point he was released from active duty and that he remain on active duty until the disposition of his case was finalized. DPPI’s complete evaluation, with attachment is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00132 INDEX CODE: 108.01, 110.02, 122.01 COUNSEL: Mr. MICHAEL J. CALABRO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Not In Line of Duty (NLOD) determination be removed from his records; all documents and references pertaining to the NLOD determination be removed from his records; his request for transfer to the...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In letters, dated 16 May and 27 July 2001, the applicant’s Senator provided copies of correspondence provided to him by the applicant and her counsel (Exhibits J and M). In further support of the appeal, counsel submits the 6 August 1982 version of the Air Force regulations governing crew rest and flight duty limitations....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03167
He receive all back pay and allowances from 15 April 2000, the date he was released from active duty, until now. He requests a medical retirement from the Air National Guard (ANG). After more physical therapy he was sent back to the ANG for duty to see if he experienced any more problems.
If it was known that he had prostate cancer but only later that it was determined to be in the LOD, they would conclude that he was retroactively entitled to the benefit of extension on AD. The Air Force also states that in their opinion, the applicant’s eligibility for benefits based on prostate cancer commenced only on 22 August 1994, when bony metastases and prostate cancer were diagnosed, and the benefit he would have been entitled to at that time was incapacitation pay. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072152C070403
The applicant’s commander stated that his injury was in line of duty. The evidence also shows that the applicant’s commander, on 5 November 1994, determined that the applicant’s injury was in line of duty, and that he was transported to the Fairview Ridges Hospital emergency room. The applicant may yet want to submit a claim to his commander for his expenses, based on the determination made by this Board to correct the 14 August 1995 finding on the line of duty investigation to “in line of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00776
The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) recommended he be retired with 40 percent disability effective 27 Sep 13. According to an AF Form 1971, Application for Incapacitation Pay, dated 20 Jun 13, the applicant requested he be approved for INCAP Pay for the period of 21 Jun to 18 Dec 13. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was entitled to receive Incapacitation Pay for the period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011233C070208
The applicant submits two separate DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record). In an application dated 20050716 and transmitted to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) by facsimile, he modifies his earlier application by requesting reimbursement of his medical expenses in the amount of $43,338.54. Army regulations authorize the applicant treatment for his injury in an Army MTF.