RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02769
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The twenty-three (23) month extension to his 25 February 1998 enlistment be
changed to a two (2) month extension and his date of separation (DOS) be
changed to 2 April 2002.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he accepted his retraining, he was told that he would be required to
extend his enlistment for two months in addition to the 21 months he had
remaining on his original four (4) year enlistment in order to meet the 23
month requirement for first-term airmen to retrain. He agreed to the two
months extension and retrained. It was not until later that he found out
that the contract was changed without his approval. He tried to fight this
action through the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) and the Air Force
Personnel Center (AFPC), but they were unable to help.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an AF Form 1411, Extension
or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air
Force Reserve, dated 24 July 2000, a letter from his commander, dated 15
July 2002, and a letter from the EWS Flight Superintendent, dated 15 July
2002.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of
staff sergeant.
On 25 February 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force with a DOS of
24 February 2002. AF Form 1411, dated 24 July 2000 indicates that on 21
July 2000, he extended his enlistment for 23 months.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial. They indicated that in accordance with AFI
36-2606, paragraph 1.17.1, eligible first-term airmen may apply for CAREERs
retraining. When airmen receive approved retraining……airmen satisfy the
retraining retainability requirement for extending their enlistment for a
total of 23 months. The applicant states the AF Form 1411 was changed
after he signed it. Though it appears as if the form has been changed, if
the form was changed prior to the applicant signing it, no additional
action is required. However, if the form was changed after the member had
signed it, the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) would have had to
administratively correct the contract IAW AFI 36-2606, paragraph 4.10.2
which requires the MPF and the member to initial all changes.
Though the form may have been changed, the applicant has no proof that it
was changed after he signed it. Additionally, as the AFI clearly states
members must extend for 23 months, there is no reason for the MPF to have
extended him for fewer months.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 20 September 2002, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
On 29 October 2002, the applicant was contacted in reference to his request
to change his DOS. He provided a statement that is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. Applicant contends that when he
accepted his retraining, he was told that he would be required to extend
his enlistment for two months in addition to the 21 months he had remaining
on his original four-year enlistment in order to meet the 23-month
requirement for first term airmen to retrain. He agreed to the two months
extension, retrained and later discovered that his contract had been
extended for 23 months. The OPR recommends denial citing the fact that,
though the form may have been changed, the applicant has no proof that it
was changed after he signed it; and that since the AFI clearly states
members must extend for 23 months, there is no reason for the MPF to have
extended him for fewer months. We disagree. We have no way of determining
whether or not the enlistment contract was changed before or after the
applicant signed it. Given the fact that the applicant had to accept the
23-month extension to quality for retraining so that he could continue on
active duty, we likewise have no way of knowing whether or not he would
have agreed to the additional extension of his enlistment had he been fully
aware of the consequences. However, since the contract was clearly altered
and does not have the applicant’s concurrence, we believe the benefit of
any doubt should be resolved in his favor.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The extension of his 25 February 1998 enlistment executed on 24 July
2000 was for a period of ten (10) months rather than twenty-three (23)
months.
b. His request to be discharged on 15 December 2002 was approved by
competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-02769
in Executive Session on 22 & 31 October 2002, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 August 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 13 September 2002.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 September 2002.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 October 2002
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-02769
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. The extension of his 25 February 1998 enlistment executed
on 24 July 2000 was for a period of ten (10) months rather than twenty-
three (23) months.
b. His request to be discharged on 15 December 2002 was
approved by competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02769 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The twenty-three (23) month extension to his 25 February 1998 enlistment be changed to a two (2) month extension and his date of separation (DOS) be changed to 2 April 2002. When airmen receive approved retraining……airmen satisfy...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
He was not told he had only 30 days to cancel the extension should the assignment get cancelled. On 29 April 2002, applicant submitted an AF Form 1411 requesting the extension be cancelled. Reenlistment personnel have also confirmed that TSgt W directed them not to do anything at that time, including not signing the form, but to direct him to complete a DD Form 149.
On 14 April 2000, the applicant, who had an established date of separation (DOS) of 25 April 2000, reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years, thereby establishing a new DOS of 13 April 2004. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded by stating that on his AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, it reflects that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00311
DPPAE recommends a constructive reenlistment be authorized on the applicant effective 1 October 2003, for 4 years and 7 months, as he should have reenlisted upon approval of the retraining. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 30 September 2003, rather than 22 March 2005, and reenlisted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03826
On 19 Jan 10, the applicant was counseled by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) via the AF IMT 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve on his extension request and his available options. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he was miscounseled when told he...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01885
The extension was not cancelled per his request. They indicated that on AF Form 1411, section VIII, the applicant initialed the block that states “I understand if the original reason for which I extended is cancelled, I may request cancellation of this extension provided I have not entered it. The evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 June 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01201
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01201 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full five years he reenlisted for on 8 Feb 05 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension...