RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01175
INDEX CODE: 113.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD) of 1 Jul 01 for
Permanent Change of Station (PCS) from Wright-Patterson AFB (WPAFB) to
the University of Ohio in Athens, OH, on 2 Jul 99 be removed from his
records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The correct ADSC for his PCS was not updated in his record within the
Air Force Personnel Data System (PDS) until Jan 00 and that he was
informed by personnel from the WPAFB Military Personnel Flight (MPF)
that he had no commitment beyond Nov 99. He relied on this incorrect
information to pursue and accept post-Air Force employment.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement
with additional documents associated with the issues cited in his
contentions. These documents are appended at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) reveals the
applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) as 11
Nov 78. He has prior enlisted service in both the Air Force Reserve
and the Regular Air Force (25 May 77 - 23 Apr 90). On 23 Apr 90, the
applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of technical sergeant
(E-6) to accept a commission. On 24 Apr 90, the applicant was
appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force, and was
voluntarily ordered to extended active duty. He is currently serving
on active duty in the grade of captain, with an effective date and
date of rank of 24 Apr 94.
On 20 Mar 00, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council
disapproved the applicant’s 25 Jan 00 request for a 10-month waiver to
his PCS ADSC of 1 Jul 01, which would have changed his effective date
of separation (DOS) to 1 Aug 00.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Officer Separations, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that in
accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2107, the applicant incurred
an ADSC of 2 years from his Date Arrived on Station (DAS) of 2 Jul 99.
In accordance with Air Force policy, the applicant was notified of
his 2-year ADSC for PCS via AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for
Permanent Change of Station, dated 23 Dec 98. Due to a combination of
administrative error and technical problems with the applicant’s
record within the Air Force Personnel Data System (PDS), the correct
ADSC date for the applicant’s PCS to Athens, OH, was not updated in
his record until approximately Jan 00.
DPPRS stated that the AF Form 899, issued to the applicant in Dec 98,
clearly shows that he was notified of the correct ADSC prior to his
reassignment to Athens, OH. DPPRS indicated that after over 20 years
of active duty service and several PCS moves, it is highly unlikely
the applicant honestly believed his PCS from WPAFB to Athens, OH,
would incur no PCS ADSC--particularly after he had been informed of
the ADSC via his PCS orders. DPPRS recommended the applicant’s
request be disapproved. A complete copy of this evaluation is
appended at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 7
July 2000 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has not been the victim
of an error or an injustice. In this respect, we note that even
though the applicant’s Permanent Change of Station (PCS) ADSC date was
not updated in the Air Force Personnel Data System (AF PDS) in a
timely manner, he was properly notified of the correct ADSC prior to
his Jul 99 reassignment to Athens, OH, via his PCS orders, dated 23
Dec 98. His PCS orders clearly indicated a PCS ADSC of 24 months. In
view of the above and absent evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 November 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, Member
Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Apr 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 27 Jun 00, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 7 Jul 00.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03613
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03613 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date, incurred due to a Permanent Change-of-Station (PCS), be changed from 29 Jun 06 to 31 May 05. He has not provided sufficient justification or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00796
He completed an Air Force (AF) Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve; however, he never received a copy of the updated AF Form 1411. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that when the applicant signed the AF Form 1411, his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was not eligible to receive a Zone C SRB; therefore,...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends that the application be denied. First, prior to his entry into AFIT in 1995, the applicant states, “I was informed that I would return for a tour of no more than 3 years to Air Command and Staff College and that my actual ADSC would be determined upon completion of my degree.” They believe the applicant is referring to the standard tour length associated with his follow-on...
Had the applicant been told prior to signing his AFHPSP contract, that he would still have to serve an additional four years for his AFROTC scholarship, he would not have accepted the AFHPSP contract. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his four-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC), incurred as a result of his Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...
Applicant’s complete statement and documentary evidence submitted in support of his application are included as Exhibit A. seven-year ADSC. Applicant was not contracted to attend UPT until well after the 15 June 1988 change to the eight-year ADSC (Exhibit C with Attachments 1 and 2).
A five-year ADSC? and applicant is not. Training ADSCs ............................................................................................................................................... 1.8.
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states, in part, that first, we can look at the events that occurred at Vance AFB, OK. HQ AFPC has stated that he must have signed a training RIP and possible a Form 63 in order to have received his assignment to Luke AFB. This was the first time he was given a Form 63 to sign and informed that he was receiving a five- year ADSC for previous training he had accomplished....
This generated a training allocation notification R I T , which clearly indicated a three-year RDSC would be incurred, and applicant was required to initial the following statements on the RIP, I I I accept training and will obtain the required retainability" and ''1 understand upon completion of this training I will incur the following active duty service commitments (ADSC) ' I . Although documentation of counseling does not exist and applicant denies that it occurred, they believe it's a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02418
In support of her request, applicant provided Reports of Individual (RIP) and orders to and from PME assignments, ADSC contract, emails, and “corrected” ADSC. The applicant subsequently received a 2 May 06 RIP that updated her ADSC to 7 Jun 08 to reflect a three-year ADSC for in-residence PME. Although we recognize that the applicant could have been aware that PME normally carries a three-year ADSC, the official RIPs and PCS orders she received and acknowledged uniformly listed an ADSC for...