RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02672
INDEX CODE: 128
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The indebtedness for storage of the non-temporary storage (NTS) of his
household goods (HHG), in the amount of $899.20, be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he retired from the Air Force on 1 November 1993 in Vicenza, Italy, he
stayed in Vicenza for numerous reasons. Each year after retirement, he
submitted a request for an extension of shipping allowances to the 22nd
Area Support Group (ASG), the servicing transportation office. Each year
he forwarded documentation to JPPSO in Colorado Springs, Colorado and each
year he received a letter back from them extending his NTS allowance, with
no indication of a cost to him. Except for 1997, they added a statement
indicating that a member must pay all storage costs after he has been
retired for one year. When he questioned the transportation management
office (TMO) about this, they said they had not been briefing retirees
about this and he (applicant) should not have to incur any costs. The TMO
would not put this in writing. Applicant states that he left Italy in
January 1997 and requested that his NTS be shipped to Charleston, South
Carolina. He was then informed of the debt.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force on 1 November 1993 at
Vicenza, Italy. He remained in the overseas area and, prior to expiration
of the travel and transportation entitlements (shipment of NTS of household
goods), he requested an extension of the time limit to travel, from the
Department of the Army, HQ 22nd Area Support Group. Transportation
entitlements were extended to 31 October 1995. In yearly increments, the
applicant requested and received extensions of the time limit for his
travel and transportation entitlements through 31 October 1998 from the
Department of the Army.
The applicant remained in Italy until January 1997. In February 1998, he
requested shipment of his storage lot from Colorado Springs, Colorado to
Charleston, South Carolina. The property was released from storage on 18
February 1998 for movement under Government Bill of Lading (GBL) ZP-
145,425. Upon release of the property from storage, the applicant was
billed $790.56 for storage costs which accrued beyond the one-year period
after his release from active duty.
The applicant filed a rebuttal of the charges in which he stated that with
the exception of the 6 October 1997 letter from the Servicing Army
Transportation Office, none of the documentation had indicated that he
would be responsible for any NTS charges. The Excess Cost Adjudication
Function (ECAF) reviewed the case and determined the applicant had incurred
excess cost for the NTS. In a re-computation, they noted the origin
transportation office had used the incorrect storage weight. The charges
were increased to $899.20 vice $790.56.
The applicant filed two subsequent rebuttals and the ECAF determined both
times that no additional information and/or documentation was submitted
that would allow their office to reduce or eliminate the excess cost
charges.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO, reviewed the
application and states that Paragraph U5365, Joint Federal Travel
Regulation (JFTR), stipulates that a member with home of selection
entitlement is authorized to store household goods (HHG) at Government
expense. The entitlement begins on the date orders are issued and
terminates one-year from the date of termination of active duty. An
extension of the one-year shipping time limit may be authorized for members
undergoing hospitalization, medical treatment, education or training, or in
certain other deserving cases. Authorization or approval must be
accomplished through the Secretarial Process. Except for medical reasons,
extension of the shipping time limit does not extend the Government’s
obligation for storage costs for longer than a one-year period from date of
termination of active duty.
Air Force Supplement to the JFTR stipulates that except for other deserving
cases, the Director, JPPSO-SAT, is delegated authority to authorize or
approve requests for extension of the shipping time limitations for all Air
Force members. There are no regulatory provisions for the Department of
the Army to approve extension of the shipping entitlements for an Air Force
member.
For members who remain in a pay status who have property in NTS, paragraph
3.4.4.2, Air Force Supplement to the JFTR stipulates the Government will
maintain the NTS account during the period of authorized extensions. DD
Form 1164, dated 11 October 1996 extended the applicant’s storage to 1
November 1997. It contained the note, “Effective 2 November 1997, all
storage costs will be at member’s expense, unless our office receives
justification for continued storage not later than 30 September 1997.”
This note advised the storage contractor that the Government was
responsible for storage charges only through 1 November 1997 and if the
property remained in storage after this date, unless further extended by
the contracting officer, they must look to the member for storage costs.
Since the approval letters prior to 6 October 1997 did not advise the
member that the approval did not include the entitlement to NTS beyond one
year after termination of active duty, the JPPSO/DIR believes the applicant
suffered an injustice. They support the applicant’s request to receive
storage entitlement to 6 October 1997.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 15 January 1999 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting relief as suggested by
the JPPSO/DIR. It appears that in each instance that the applicant
requested an extension for non-temporary storage (NTS) of his household
goods (HHG), he was informed that the request for extension was approved;
however, he was not advised there would be a cost to him commencing one
year after termination of active duty. JPPSO/DIR states that since the
approval letters prior to 6 October 1997 did not advise the applicant that
the approval did not include the entitlement to the costs of NTS beyond the
one-year after termination of his active duty, they believe the applicant
has suffered an injustice. We note that the applicant states, in his 6
September 1998 letter to the AFBCMR, that his debt to the government should
be waived and we assume that he refers to the amount of $899.20. However,
JPPSO/DIR states that they would support storage entitlement to 6 October
1997, the time he was informed of the debt and the applicant would be
responsible for storage costs in the amount of $144.00, and we agree.
Applicant’s request for complete remission of his debt is duly noted;
however, since he was advised on 6 October 1997 of his obligation to pay
for the cost of NTS, we believe the remaining costs should be the
responsibility of the applicant. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority approved his
request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlement for non-
temporary storage (NTS) of household goods to 6 October 1997, under the
provisions of Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), paragraph U5365-D.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 16 March 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Lawrence Leehy, Member
Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Sep 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, JPPSO/DIR, dated 7 Dec 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Jan 99.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-02672
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to ---- . -----, --, be corrected to show that competent authority
approved his request for extension of his travel and transportation
entitlement for non-temporary storage (NTS) of household goods to 6 October
1997, under the provisions of Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR),
paragraph U5365-D.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UN 3 0 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of ment of the Air The pertinent Force relating to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011614C071029
Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was told by the Yongsan, Korea transportation office that the shipment [papers] showed delivery, but he would have to contact the Colorado transportation office for an exact delivery date. He stated he was told in Korea that a delivery date had to be entered on the DD Form 1299.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03808
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was counseled that he is entitled to one year of storage following his retirement from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02814
The entitlement begins on the date the orders are issued and terminates one year from the date of termination of active duty. However, evidence shows the applicant agreed to have his HHG shipped to Lancaster, CA, upon his separation from active duty and subsequently requested an extension of storage until 23 December 2005. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...
1 4 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DEC @ 8 1998 DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03195 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No PPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: The Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, DD Form 1299, dated 12 June 1996, be amended in Block 10, Destination Information, to reflect "Denver, Colorado,,, rather than, "Colorado Springs , Colorado. PPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013683
The Director further recommends the Board direct the DFAS documentation for excess weight for the transportation of HHG for the applicant under the applicable Bill of Lading include the authorized weight allowance of her husband. The evidence of record further shows that the applicants husband submitted two requests for extension of his HHG shipment entitlements, by reason of his spouses (the applicant) assignment at Fort Hood. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021629
She claims she requested the shipment of her NTS goods from Virginia to Guam and she was informed by Guam transportation personnel she was required to pay for the shipment of her HHG because based on her orders, the expiration of her shipping entitlement was in April 2009. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show she was granted an exception to policy and her NTS expiration date was in fact 30 September 2009; and by reimbursing her the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02012
Per JFTR paragraph U5012-I, a written time extension that includes an explanation of circumstances justifying the extension may: 1) be authorized/approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial Process; 2) be authorized or approved only when circumstances prevent use within the prescribed time, and must be for the shortest time appropriate under the circumstances; 3) not be granted merely to accommodate personal preferences or conveniences (DoD/CG #99-1); and 4) not be...