. "
1
4
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DEC @ 8 1998
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03195
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
PPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
The Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property,
DD Form 1299, dated 12 June 1996, be amended in Block 10,
Destination Information, to reflect "Denver, Colorado,,, rather
than, "Colorado Springs , Colorado.
PPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
STAT EMENT 0 F FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
The Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO/DIR,
reviewed this application and states that when the applicant
first contacted the Traffic Management Office (TMO) to arrange
for the shipment of his HHG, he did not have a destination so he
requested nontemporary storage (NTS) . At his counseling, the
destination was changed from NTS to Colorado Springs at the
applicant s request. When special routing or services have been
furnished at the member's request, the member is to bear the cost
of transportation above the maximum amount authorized at
Government expense based on the cost of shipping the HHG without
the special routing or services. In the applicant's case, he
incurred excess cost in requesting special services in the
c.
delivery of his HHG from temporary storage to a destination
beyond the 30-mile radius for a local delivery. Since the
applicant requested shipment of his Household Goods (HHG) to
Colorado Springs and desired to have them delivered from storage
to a destination beyond the 30-mile radius for a local delivery,
he must be held responsible for the difference in cost.
Therefore, they recommend denial of his request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit C .
%.
PPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVAJiUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 9 March 1998, for review and response. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3 . Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant's contentions, we believe the applicant's options with
respect to the shipment of his household goods (HHG) may have
been misrepresented. In this respect, we note the applicant
he had the option of
states that he was advised b
storing his HHG
but at no time during
ion made as to where in
the discussion
addition, the
he had
applicant was la
JPPSO handled
storage for the
ent from the
individual that counseled the applicant would be helpful in
deciding this case, in view of the circumstances of this case, we
believe any doubt should be decided in the applicant's favor.
Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
THE BOA RD RECOMMENDS THAT :
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Application
for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, DD Form 1299,
dated 12 June 1996, be amended in Block 10, Destination
-
2
Information, to reflect "Denver,
"Colorado Springs, Colorado.
rather than,
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 19 August 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2602 :
-.
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Walter J. Hosey, Member
Mr. Henry Romo, Jr. , Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
as recommended.
All members voted to correct the records,
following documentary evidence was considered:
The
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B,
Exhibit C. Letter, JPSSO/DIR, dated 12 Feb 97.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 9 Mar 98,
DD Form 149, dated 10 Oct 97, w/atchs.
Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
/
Panel Chair
3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
DEC 0 8 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 97-03 195
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
records of the Department of the Air Force relating
rrected to show that the Application for Shipmen
1299, dated 12 June 1996, be amended in Block 10, Destination
Information, to reflect “Denver, Colorado,” rather than, “Colorado Springs, Colorado.”
/ Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011614C071029
Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was told by the Yongsan, Korea transportation office that the shipment [papers] showed delivery, but he would have to contact the Colorado transportation office for an exact delivery date. He stated he was told in Korea that a delivery date had to be entered on the DD Form 1299.
It appears that in each instance that the applicant requested an extension for non-temporary storage (NTS) of his household goods (HHG), he was informed that the request for extension was approved; however, he was not advised there would be a cost to him commencing one year after termination of active duty. However, JPPSO/DIR states that they would support storage entitlement to 6 October 1997, the time he was informed of the debt and the applicant would be responsible for storage costs in...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UN 3 0 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of ment of the Air The pertinent Force relating to show that...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to DD Form 139, Pay Adjustment Authorization, dated 19 Dec 2000, the applicant incurred excess cost for long delivery out of storage in transit from Montgomery, AL to Auburn, AL. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Commander, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO/CC, recommended denial. If the applicant had requested shipment of his...
Thus, once the applicant's HHG shipment departed Germany, there was no opportunity to divert the shipment until it arrived at the port of Long Beach. VP-119,872 with a net weight of 13,364 pound was charged a total of $969.00 for excess di ore of Abilene TX Loma Linda CA vice the authorized destination he ade c. After arriving in'the US,-traveled to Tulsa OK. On 1 June 1994, he visited the Traffic Management Office (TMO) at Dyess AFB TX and requested the HHG shipment that was en route to...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00610 t-tkil 51999 HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The additional "Excess Cost" of $334.11 she was assessed for shipping her Household Goods (HHG) to Wichita, KS, vice Kansas City, MO, be eliminated. Therefore, regardless of the shipment weight, the applicant would have still incurred excess cost charges to ship the property to the alternate destination. JPPSO-DTR...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02814
The entitlement begins on the date the orders are issued and terminates one year from the date of termination of active duty. However, evidence shows the applicant agreed to have his HHG shipped to Lancaster, CA, upon his separation from active duty and subsequently requested an extension of storage until 23 December 2005. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01713
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends approval. Should the board agree, the record should be changed to reflect the applicant's property was released from storage in transit on 5 August 2013, and the debt for NTS after the one year time...
Normally, when the carrier arrives at destination, they contact the destination transportation office who coordinate the delivery with the military member. According to JPPSO/XO, the applicant’s shipment exceeded the prescribed weight allowance as evidence by two sets of weight tickets, one at origin and one at destination. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 16 Nov 99,...
She indicated on her DD Form 1299, Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, that her shipment would contain professional items. In support of her request applicant provided a memorandum from the Quality Assurance office; her excess cost rebuttal adjudication letter; DD Forms 139, Pay Adjustment Authorization; DD Form 1299; AF Form 767, Extended Active Duty Order; and, Notification of Indebtedness letter. ...