Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021629
Original file (20090021629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021629 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reimbursement of $854.00.

2.  The applicant states when she attended her personal property counseling on 4 December 2008, she was informed her NTS [non-temporary storage] entitlement expired on 31 July 2009.  She claims the DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property), in the remarks section, contained a statement indicating her NTS entitlement expired on 31 July 2009 and she was required to initial this statement acknowledging she understood the statement.  She further indicates that after completing the required paperwork at the transportation office during her personal property counseling, the entitlement expiration date was further verified in personal property tracking e-mails.  She states her shipping destination was Guam.  When she requested the release of her household goods (HHG) out of NTS in Virginia, she was informed by the personal property office at the Naval Base Guam that the entitlement expiration date was incorrect and she was erroneously counseled.  She was further informed the correct expiration date of the entitlement should have been in April 2009.

3.  The applicant further states she waited for an answer on her entitlement until taking her case to small claims court and on 23 September 2009, she was informed by the Guam personal property office that she was required to pay $854.00 for the NTS costs incurred between April and September 2009, and that she would have to seek reimbursement from this Board.  


4.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* DA Form 1299 
* DD Form 1797 (Personal Property Counseling Checklist)
* Orders 165-0003, issued by Headquarters, Fort Myer Military Community, Arlington, VA, dated 13 June 2008
* Bill of Lading for Executive Moving Systems, Inc.
* copy of Bank of Guam Cashier's Check for $854.00, dated 22 September 2009 and forwarding letter, dated 5 October 2009
* Personal Property Shipment Tracking document
* service order NTS shipping document

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows Orders 165-0003, dated 12 June 2008, directed her release from active duty on 2 October 2008.  The additional instructions portion of these orders stated she was authorized movement of dependents and shipment of HHG at government expense up to 6 months subsequent to her expiration of term of service (ETS) date.

2.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Transportation Policy Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4.  The advisory official stated that under the provisions of the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), paragraph U5360, the applicant was authorized up to 180 days of NTS in the vicinity of her last duty station, Fort Myers, based on her separation orders.  The advisory official states the applicant's storage entitlement began on 2 October 2008 and ended on 1 April 2009.  He further states the Transportation Office clearly was in error in counseling the applicant that her 180 days of NTS began on the pack and pickup date in January 2009, and that the expiration date was 31 July 2009.  He further states the Government Accountability Office (GAO) determined in a 27 January 1997, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals case that the Government cannot be bound by the erroneous act of its agents, even when committed in the performance of their official duties.  The Comptroller General has held that neither misrepresentation by a transportation officer nor misinformation provided by military officials provides a legal basis for reimbursement.

3.  A copy of the advisory opinion was furnished to the applicant for information and to allow her the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  On 9 July 2010, the applicant responded to the advisory opinion.  She stated that she disagreed with the opinion and outlined the facts of her case.  Records show she 


separated from the Army in October 2008 and during her separation processing she was informed by transportation officials at the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office (JPPSO) in Virginia that her NTS entitlement expiration date was 31 July 2009.  She claims she requested the shipment of her NTS goods from Virginia to Guam and she was informed by Guam transportation personnel she was required to pay for the shipment of her HHG because based on her orders, the expiration of her shipping entitlement was in April 2009.

4.  The applicant claims she was charged for this shipment through no fault of her own and she was only following the guidance given her by transportation personnel from the JPPSO in Virginia.   She further states that she was charged for the shipping costs and received her final response that she was accountable to pay the shipping and storage costs for August and September 2009, which is the period she was waiting for an answer on her entitlement.  She is requesting reimbursement in the amount of $854.00 she was required to pay for the shipment and storage based on the administrative error made by transportation officials at the JPPSO - Washington, Fort Belvoir, VA, who established her entitlement expiration date as 31 July 2009.

5.  The applicant provides a DD Form 1299 completed at the Joint Property Shipping Office-Washington, Fort Belvoir, dated 4 December 2008.  This document confirms she was informed her NTS shipping entitlement expired on 31 July 2009.

6.  A Bill of Lading provided by the applicant also shows the NTS goods were picked up on 19 January 2009 and that her entitlement expiration date was 
31 July 2009.

7.  A Personal Property Shipment Tracking document provided by the applicant also shows her NTS entitlement expiration date as 31 July 2009.  The applicant also provides a Cashier's Check for $854.00 she used to pay her NTS shipping costs.

8.  The JFTR, Volume 1, provides policy guidance on per diem, travel and transportation allowances, relocation allowances, and certain other allowances of Uniformed Service Active Duty and Reserve Component members.  Paragraph U5360 provides guidance on NTS storage.  It states a member who is authorized HHG transportation is authorized NTS.  The authorization begins on the date the order is issued and terminates at the expiration of the 180th day from the active duty termination date.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that she should be reimbursed the cost she incurred for NTS and shipping of her HHG has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  Although the governing regulation does establish a 180 day NTS limit from the date the order is issued, there are equity considerations in this case that support an exception to policy.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the responsible JPSO erroneously informed the applicant her NTS expiration date was 31 July 2009, and she complied with this guidance.  Because of this error, she was not successful in having her HHG released from storage until September 2009.  Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show she was granted an exception to policy and her NTS expiration date was in fact       30 September 2009; and by reimbursing her the $854.00 she paid for the shipping and storage costs of her NTS HHG.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting her record to show her NTS expiration date was 30 September 2009, and reimbursing her the $854.00 she already paid for the shipping and storage costs of her NTS HHG.



      ____________X_________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021629



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021629



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011614C071029

    Original file (20060011614C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was told by the Yongsan, Korea transportation office that the shipment [papers] showed delivery, but he would have to contact the Colorado transportation office for an exact delivery date. He stated he was told in Korea that a delivery date had to be entered on the DD Form 1299.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05924

    Original file (BC 2012 05924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office – Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05924

    Original file (BC 2012 05924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office – Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002823

    Original file (20140002823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was authorized an extension of non-temporary storage (NTS) of his household goods (HHG) at government expense (in effect, remission of his NTS debt). The evidence of record shows the applicant separated from active duty on 31 May 2010 and his discharge orders indicate he was authorized movement of his HHG at government expense up to 180 days subsequent to his ETS date. The governing regulation states the authority for HHG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014997

    Original file (20140014997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * Orders 128-057, issued by U.S. Army Installation Management Command (IMCOM), directed her to permanently change her station (PCS) from Fort Rucker, AL to Joint Base San Antonio(JBSA), Texas * on 20 May 2013, her spouse, who had power of attorney, was incorrectly advised by the Fort Rucker, AL transportation office (ITO) their HHG could be kept in NTS * on or about 21 June 2013 her HHG were placed in NTS, with a storage expiration date of 12 July 2014 * this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007243

    Original file (20080007243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). An Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, dated 8 January 2007, shows in item 10 (Destination Information) that the applicant elected to ship his HHG to Dallas, Texas. In response to the request for reimbursement of the cost of shipping his HHGs from Texas to Arizona, the DA G-4 authorized a partial payment to the applicant of $1,175.33, which was the maximum cost that would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013683

    Original file (20080013683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director further recommends the Board direct the DFAS documentation for excess weight for the transportation of HHG for the applicant under the applicable Bill of Lading include the authorized weight allowance of her husband. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant’s husband submitted two requests for extension of his HHG shipment entitlements, by reason of his spouse’s (the applicant) assignment at Fort Hood. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01713

    Original file (BC 2014 01713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends approval. Should the board agree, the record should be changed to reflect the applicant's property was released from storage in transit on 5 August 2013, and the debt for NTS after the one year time...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703195

    Original file (9703195.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1 4 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DEC @ 8 1998 DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03195 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No PPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: The Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, DD Form 1299, dated 12 June 1996, be amended in Block 10, Destination Information, to reflect "Denver, Colorado,,, rather than, "Colorado Springs , Colorado. PPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03808

    Original file (BC-2005-03808.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was counseled that he is entitled to one year of storage following his retirement from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...