RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02078
INDEX CODE: 135.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive payment for inactive duty training (IDT) performed at Offutt
AFB, NE on 1 July 1998.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Upon being notified of his retirement date he scheduled a final tour of
duty at USSTRATCOM. This tour was approved by the Joint Reserve Office
at USSTRATCOM. No mention was made that he wouldn’t be paid for 1 July
1998. He served that day and feels he should be paid.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 9 March 1998, the applicant, serving in the Air Force Reserve, was
sent a letter notifying him that his Mandatory Separation Date (MSD)
would expire on 1 July 1998 and he must either apply for transfer to the
Retired Reserve by his MSD or be discharged from his Reserve appointment.
The applicant completed an AF Form 131, Application for Transfer to the
Retire Reserve, on 25 April 1998, with a requested retirement effective
date of 1 July 1998.
Reserve Order EK-0492, dated 29 May 1998, transferring the applicant to
the Retire Reserve, effective 1 July 1998, was published and forwarded to
the applicant and his unit on 11 June 1998.
The applicant performed IDT on 1 July 1998. The Reserve Pay office at
Hill AFB Utah sent the applicant a letter, on 9 September 1998,
notifying him that his request for pay for the IDTs he pulled on 1 July
1998 would not be paid since he retired on 1 July 1998 and the last day a
member can be paid is the day prior to the effective date of retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Deputy Director of the Directorate of Personnel Program Management,
ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that the requested
correction of military records cannot be administratively accomplished at
this headquarters. They further state that on or after the retirement
effective date, no further participation is authorized in the Selected
Reserve for pay or points (AFI 36-3209, paragraph 5.11). In addition,
the law requires the applicant to retire or be discharged on his
established MSD of 1 July 1998; therefore, the retirement effective date
cannot be changed to 2 July 1998 to allow him to receive pay for duty he
performed on 1 July 1998. Therefore, they recommend denial of the
application.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that the
information sent to him by the Air Reserve Personnel Center Separations
Branch on 9 March 1998 pertaining to his retirement options and
subsequent correspondence concerning his mandatory separation never
stated that he could not perform duty for pay and points on his
retirement date; i.e., 1 July 1998.
Based upon this apparent misunderstanding, he scheduled his last tour of
duty to include 1 July 1998 to finalize his association with USSTRATCOM.
He notes further that the 1 July 1998 Individual Inactive Duty Training
period was approved by the appropriate authorizing official. He included
a copy of AF Form 40A for the records. He states apparently he wasn’t
the only person who misunderstood the rules and regulations surrounding
this issue.
He states that it wasn’t until he submitted the 40A, which covered the 1
July 1998 period, for payment that he was informed that regulations
prohibit payment for this day. He asks if he can’t be paid for 1 July
1998 nor receive points, can another day be substituted for 1 July 1998?
Since he spent the weekend of 27 and 28 June 1998 at Offutt AFB waiting
to complete his tour of duty, perhaps one of these days can be
substituted for 1 July 1998.
Based upon these circumstances, he feels that he should be paid for 1
July 1998 and that the two points he earned be applied to his USAFR
Points Summary. He also recommends that in the future, information
provided by the Air Reserve Personnel Center Separations Branch in regard
to a mandatory retirement date be more specific; that is, clarify that
pay and retirement points are accrued up to but not including your
mandatory retirement date.
In summary, he acted in good faith when he scheduled his tour of duty,
this tour was approved by the appropriate authorizing official, he didn’t
receive any information which specified that he couldn’t receive pay or
points on his retirement day, and he performed duty on 1 July 1998.
Applicant's complete response, without attachments, is attached at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice notwithstanding the fact that
the applicant appears to have acted in good faith. As indicated by the
Air Force, in accordance with AFI 36-3209, paragraph 5.11, on or after
the retirement effective date, no further participation is authorized in
the Selected Reserve for pay or points. The law requires the applicant
to retire or be discharged on his established MSD of 1 July 1998 and this
date cannot be changed to a later date to allow him to receive pay for
duty he performed on 1 July 1998. And, while it is regrettable that the
applicant performed Reserve training on his MSD, we do not find the
denial of pay and points for this short period sufficiently egregious to
resort to a creative correction to grant relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 8 April 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Ms. Phyllis L. Spence, Examiner (without vote)
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jul 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DP, dated 1 Dec 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Dec 98.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 10 Jan 99.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
f the Department of the Air Force relating t corrected to show that: , Headquarters ARPC, Denver, Colorado, dated 20 April Reserve position and assigning him to the Inactive b. II c d. His record, as corrected, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB); and, his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the Fiscal Year 1995 (FY95) Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05455
On 26 Oct 04, the applicant was selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 1 Oct 98. On 10 Apr 06, as a result of the applicants request before the AFBCMR (AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03564) to restore lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, retirement consideration, correct his DD Form 214, and correct his reserve status after separation from the Regular Air Force, a directive was published...
On 6 Mar 02, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, requesting that his records be corrected to show that he reenlisted within 90 days of his expiration term of service (ETS) of 31 May 98. On 19 Mar 98, the applicant requested 27 days of terminal Leave, the request was approved and the leave was taken. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02- 01132 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00117
Although the IDT periods he is claiming are from many years ago, the evidence he is submitting clearly substantiates the performance of the duty being claimed. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice since the non-pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00744
The applicant did not have an MSD at the time he was in the Honorary Retired Reserve; he will retire with 26 years, 8 months, and 11 days of satisfactory service. If that period is counted as part of his 28 years of commissioned service in establishing his MSD, as it currently is, it denies him the opportunity to actually perform 28 years of service, since he was not permitted to serve for pay or points during the one year, one month, and four day period as an honorary retiree. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01721
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03038
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her original MSD extension request and correspondence related to the matter under review. On 15 Dec 08, NGB/A1POE recommended approval; however, the ANG Chief of Chaplains (NGB/HC) subsequently recommended denial, indicating the applicant’s retention was not in the best interests of the Air Force. However, inasmuch as the Board lacks the authority to reinstate applicants into the ANG, we believe the proper and fitting relief in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested an extension to her MSD to allow her the opportunity to complete 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement. In this respect, we note the applicant timely requested an extension of her 31 Dec 12 MSD in Mar 12;...