RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01603
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: Not indicated
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The “Not In the Line of Duty” determination be changed to “In The Line of
Duty” (ILOD).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Aerospace Medicine Branch, Directorate, Health Services, HQ
AFRC/SGP, reviewed the application and states that there was no new medical
information included in this AFBCMR or the congressional inquiry, which had
not already been included in the ILOD. The medical information provided in
all three cases indicate that the medical conditions associated with the
8 December 1997 event were the result of a disease process which began
before the start of the applicant’s period of military duty (5-8 December
1997). This is further supported by the
applicant’s 5 December 1997 complaints of headaches and not feeling well.
There is no indication that military service aggravated the individual’s
medical condition. They do not recommend the requested relief be granted.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and states that the
applicant clearly had no history of a seizure disorder prior to the one
suffered on 8 December 1997. Also abundantly clear from the records
reviewed is the fact that there is no evidence that he was suffering from a
preexisting condition at the time of his Unit Training Assembly (UTA)
duties on the weekend of 5-7 December 1997. Records show that he reported
a headache the first day of his training, but they do not indicate this was
occurring prior to that first day of training...either in the memorandum
prepared by his commander or in the medical records from his ensuing
admission which specifically states he suffered headaches on 5 and 6
December and not for any days prior to then. While it might be argued that
the applicant’s prior intracranial tumor and resulting surgery, and
possibly the head injury from age 15, might be related to development of
his seizure disorder, these were not found unfitting for reserve duty up to
the time of this incident. His new on-set seizure disorder starting on 8
December 1997 is obviously currently unfitting and he carries a temporary
“4P” profile attesting to that. This is set to expire on 10 December 1998.
To say that the seizure disorder was an Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)
condition flies in the face of evidence to the contrary. The BCMR Medical
Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s request to change his LOD-
No to LOD-Yes should be granted.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28
September 1998 and 20 November 1998, for review and response. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. The BCMR Medical Consultant
states that there is no evidence that the applicant was suffering from a
preexisting condition at the time of his Unit Training Assembly (UTA)
duties on the weekend of 5-7 December 1997. Both the applicant’s military
and civilian neurologists in their statements confirm that he had no prior
history of seizure disorder before this event. In view of the foregoing,
and to offset any possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. A Line of Duty (LOD) investigation initiated on 11 December
1997 was to determine if the diagnosis of “seizure disorder” was “in line
of duty,” and that appropriate Air Force authority determined that the
diagnosis was “in line of duty.”
b. On 10 December 1997, competent medical authority determined
that the medical diagnosis incapacitated the member for worldwide duty from
8 December 1997 to 28 February 1999, and that he is entitled to all pay and
benefits IAW applicable laws.
c. He be immediately evaluated through the Air Force Disability
Evaluation System to determine his fitness for continued military duty.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 2 March 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Panel Chair
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 May 1998, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/SGP, dated 1 Sept 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 18 Nov 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 November 1998.
MICHAEL P. HIGGINS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-01603
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. A Line of Duty (LOD) investigation initiated on
11 December 1997 was to determine if the diagnosis of “seizure disorder”
was “in line of duty,” and that appropriate Air Force authority determined
that the diagnosis was “in line of duty.”
b. On 10 December 1997, competent medical authority
determined that the medical diagnosis incapacitated the member for
worldwide duty from 8 December 1997 to 28 February 1999, and that he is
entitled to all incapacitation pay and benefits IAW applicable laws.
c. He be immediately evaluated through the Air Force
Disability Evaluation System to determine his fitness for continued
military duty.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air
Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01051
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01051 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid Incapacitation Pay, in behalf of her late husband, for the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. We note the Air Force offices of primary responsibility recommend granting the decedents widow incapacitation pay for the requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03663
In July 2007, she returned to work on a limited basis. The complete CV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's commander provided a response on the applicant's behalf stating various internal mistakes delayed an LOD determination until 2 May 2006. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01350
Her original blood clot was from a mutation called Factor V Leiden, but her condition worsened by the size of the clot, which caused her vein to be enlarged. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 June 2010 her condition of Post-Phlebitic Syndrome and venous insufficiency of the right internal jugular vein was found to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Line of Duty (LOD) Determination documents be placed in her medical records in order for the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process to continue. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01668
The applicant was serving on active duty orders for more than 30 days, and the Air Force was required by law to continue him on active duty orders. The applicant served on active duty continuously from 2004 until 9 Oct 09, the date of his removal from active duty. The Counsel's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant relief by changing...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00063
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, and copies of Reserve Order D-14019, a heart consultants diagnosis, Post Deployment Health Assessment, active duty orders, Line Of Duty (LOD) determination, Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) orders, electronic communications, and several tax returns. The evaluation did not reveal a definite diagnosis which warranted an LOD determination; therefore, the applicant was released from active duty orders as fit for duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02185
AFRC/SGP opines the applicant met the requirements for retention on active duty orders for the period of 1 October 2010 to 20 January 2011, based on a 20 January 2011 medical evaluation, rendered by a Family Practice Physician, which indicated that he was having no problems and was cleared for duty. However, based on the comments of the orthopedic physician, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to warrant his continuance on active duty orders until 5 October 2011. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02344
Examiners note: According to the governing SAF/AA policy letter dated 8 December 2006, (Exhibit B) entitlement to medical continuation orders begins when the condition renders the member unable to perform military duty not when the injury occurred or when the airman was released from active duty. The applicant was not continued on active duty or placed on medical continuation orders until 16 June 2011 after completion of the LOD determination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02357
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available records, the applicant served on active duty, from 13 Oct 82 to 29 Oct 92 and was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. They must have eight years of active service and have been on active duty orders for more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as subsequently determined by the PEB, and meet all other requirements set forth under the law and governing Air Force...