RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02185
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His active duty orders for the period 1 October 2009 to
30 September 2010 be extended to 5 October 2011 due to his In-
the-Line-of-Duty (ILOD) injury.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During his active duty tour, he incurred a severe tibia/fibula
fracture of his right leg in a motorcycle accident while
participating in a commander approved race event on 3 September
2010. A Line of Duty (LOD) determination was initiated on
26 November 2010 and finalized with a finding of ILOD on 5 April
2011. A Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 5 April 2011,
indicates his release from physical limitations/restrictions
would expire on 5 October 2011.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of
civilian and military medical records, his California Drivers
License, Informal Line of Duty Determination, Ground Mishap
Worksheet, Safety Monitor Witness Statement, and active duty
orders.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently a member of the Air Force Reserve
(AFRES) serving in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
According to the Informal LOD Determination, dated 5 December
2010, the applicant was racing his motorcycle in a sanctioned
event on 3 September 2010. His motorcycle was struck by another
contender and the applicant was thrown off, leading to his
injuries. The applicants active duty orders ended on
30 September 2010; therefore, he was released from active duty.
According to the AFRES Deputy Command Surgeon, Clinical
Operations/Command Nurse, an LOD determination was initiated on
26 November 2010 and was finalized with a finding of ILOD on
5 April 2011.
According to a medical evaluation by a Family Practitioner, dated
20 January 2011, Patient had internal fixation of right tibia
and fibula. Patient reports no issue or problem. Patient takes
vicodin 1-2 tablets twice a week for acute pain/ache. Patient
will follow up in 3 mns [months]. Otherwise patient is cleared
to return to duty. However, a subsequent medical evaluation by
an Orthopedics physician, dated 28 March 2011, indicates His
[Patient] recovery is on course for such a severe injury. It may
take 18-24 mo [months] from injury for him to recover to nearly
full function. It is not unreasonable to expect him to recover
to the point that he can continue in the security forces career
field, but it will take longer than 1 year after the injury to
reach maximum recovery. For now his restrictions should be sit
down job/light duty, no deployment/mobility. These restrictions
have been continuous since Sep 10 and any return to duty
restrictions determination from Jan 11 was in error.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/SGP recommends partial grant. SGP states that in accordance
with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1241.2, Reserve
Incapacitation System Management, Air Reserve Component (ARC)
members on orders for more than 30 days who incur a condition in
the line of duty that renders them unfit for military duty will
be retained on active duty orders until returned to duty or
separated via the disability evaluation system. A 20 January
2011 medical evaluation indicates the applicant was having no
problems and was cleared for duty. It appears the applicant met
the requirements for retention on active duty orders for pay and
allowances for the period of 1 October 2010 to 20 January 2011.
However, nothing provided indicates a need to continue these
entitlements through 5 October 2011 as requested.
The complete SGP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Family Practice physicians 20 January 2011 determination to
return him to full, unlimited duty was in error, as noted by the
orthopedic commander. The Orthopedic physicians evaluation on
28 March 2011 provides clear detail of the extent of his severe
injury and that the recovery time would be 16-24 months.
The applicants complete rebuttal, with attachments is at Exhibit
D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
considering the totality of the evidence before us, we are
persuaded that the requested relief is warranted in this case.
In this regard, we note that in accordance with DoDI 1241.2
Reserve members on orders for more than 30 days who incur a
condition in the line of duty that renders them unfit for
military duty will be retained on active duty orders until they
are either returned to duty or separated via the disability
evaluation system (DES). In view of this and since the
applicant was on such orders at the time of his 3 September 2010
injury, which was determined to be ILOD, he should have been
retained on active duty until the final disposition of his DES
processing occurred. AFRC/SGP opines the applicant met the
requirements for retention on active duty orders for the period
of 1 October 2010 to 20 January 2011, based on a 20 January 2011
medical evaluation, rendered by a Family Practice Physician,
which indicated that he was having no problems and was cleared
for duty. However, based on the comments of the orthopedic
physician, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient
evidence to warrant his continuance on active duty orders until
5 October 2011. In this respect, we note the 28 March 2011
medical evaluation, in which an orthopedic physician indicated
the applicants injury would take longer than a year from the
date of the injury to reach maximum recovery and that in the
meantime he could be utilized in a restricted capacity, i.e.,
sit-down job/light duty, with no deployment/mobility. The
orthopedic physician also indicated the 20 January 2011 return
to duty without restrictions determination by a family practice
physician was in error. Based on the aforementioned, the Board
believes that in order to provide the applicant fair and
equitable relief, his records should be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not
released from active duty on 30 September 2010, but was continued
on active duty until 5 October 2011.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02185 in Executive Session on 2 February 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
02185 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 May 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/SGP, not dated, with atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Sep 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Oct 11, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02344
Examiners note: According to the governing SAF/AA policy letter dated 8 December 2006, (Exhibit B) entitlement to medical continuation orders begins when the condition renders the member unable to perform military duty not when the injury occurred or when the airman was released from active duty. The applicant was not continued on active duty or placed on medical continuation orders until 16 June 2011 after completion of the LOD determination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00488
In accordance with paragraph 6.6.3.2 of DoD Instruction 1241.2, Reserve Component Incapacitation System Management, a Reserve component member on active duty under a call or order to active duty of 31 or more days who incurs or aggravates an injury, illness, or disease in the line of duty shall, with the member's consent, be continued on active duty until the member is determined to be fit for duty or separated or retired as a result of a Disability Evaluation System (DES) determination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03777
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03777 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03171
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03171 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was not released from active duty on 28 Mar 10, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until he was disability retired on 24 Sep 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00333
Later, he received a shot of cortisone to help manage the pain and was told that he may need surgery to correct his problem; the surgery was not one that could be performed in theater. Therefore, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Mar 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His condition of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) be changed to reflect In the Line of Duty (ILOD) rather than Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) Line of Duty Not Applicable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118
The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Line of Duty (LOD) Determination documents be placed in her medical records in order for the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process to continue. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00563
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, AFRC IMT 348, Informal Line of Duty (LOD) Determination, excerpts from his medical records, and correspondence related to the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...