Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801574
Original file (9801574.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-01574
            INDEX CODE: 106.00
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons applicant believes he has been  the  victim  of  an  error
and/or an injustice are contained in his complete submission, which is
at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Pursuant to General Court-Martial  Order  No.  2,  the  applicant  was
reduced from the grade of staff  sergeant  to  airman  basic  and  was
separated from the Air Force on 15 November 1991 with  a  bad  conduct
discharge for wrongful use of cocaine. He had 10 years, 3 months,  and
29 days of active service and all  of  his  performance  reports  were
given overall ratings of “9,” the  highest  attainable  rating  during
this time period.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are  contained  in  the  letter
prepared by the appropriate office of  the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Associate Chief, Military Justice Division,  AFLSA/JAJM,  reviewed
this appeal and provides the relevant facts of the case as well as his
rationale for recommending denial.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant 28 September 1998 for review and comment within 30 days.  As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice.  After a thorough review
of the evidence of record  and  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded that the BCD should be upgraded. Applicant’s contentions are
duly noted; however, we do not find these  uncorroborated  assertions,
in  and  by  themselves,  sufficiently  persuasive  to  override   the
rationale provided by the Air  Force.  We  therefore  agree  with  the
recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed  to  sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or  an  injustice.  In
view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the  contrary,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 6 July 1999 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Gary Appleton, Member
                 Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Jul 98, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFLSA, dated 24 Aug 98.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Sep 98.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01530

    Original file (BC-2004-01530.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, AFLSA/JAJM, dated 12 Jul 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Jul 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801433

    Original file (9801433.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01433 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1955 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be changed to an honorable or an under honorable conditions discharge. Further, given the fact that he had three court-martial convictions during his brief period of military service, we are not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802541

    Original file (9802541.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02541 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1960 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable or, in the alternative, his first (honorable) enlistment be separated from his second enlistment so he can receive medical benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02123

    Original file (BC-2003-02123.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-02123 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1978 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. He was granted a reduction in his adjudged sentence by the convening authority and a further reduction by the Court of Military Review. A complete copy of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03093

    Original file (BC-2002-03093.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 21 Jan 88. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. We considered upgrading his discharge on the basis of clemency; however, due to the serious nature of the offenses committed, in the short period of time in which he served, we believe that the characterization of his discharge was proper and in compliance with the appropriate directives.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03093

    Original file (BC-2002-03093.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 21 Jan 88. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. We considered upgrading his discharge on the basis of clemency; however, due to the serious nature of the offenses committed, in the short period of time in which he served, we believe that the characterization of his discharge was proper and in compliance with the appropriate directives.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03418

    Original file (BC-2004-03418.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03418 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 7 May 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 2003 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. On 8 Oct 03, the applicant was separated in the grade of airman basic with a BCD after three years, five months and five days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00941

    Original file (BC-2002-00941.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFLSA/JAJM recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803506

    Original file (9803506.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03506 INDEX CODE: 126 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) imposed on 11 December 1997, be set aside and his grade of technical sergeant (E-6) be restored. At any rate, the commander did not have the decision of the city attorney to consider...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02512

    Original file (BC-2002-02512.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02512 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The court-martial, convening authority and the appellate court considered his psychological diagnosis, as well as other mitigating evidence. A complete copy of the...