RECORD
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
OF PROCEEDINGS
CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00378
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD)
upgraded to general. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau
Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided
investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C.
be
of
an
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit 'D) .
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
However, applicant's son provided a statement on behalf of his
father (see Exhibit F) .
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinioh appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
A
c
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Mr. William H.
Anderson, and Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on
11 February 1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. FBI Report
D. Advisory Opinion
E. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
F. Applicant's Son's Statement
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00189
On 28 Mar 88, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Misconduct-drug abuse. His son would not get help. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be granted (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. FBI Report F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding FBI Report
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation, (FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.
On 13 July 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit E. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit F). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01869 INDEX CODE 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his 15 May 1969 under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The advisory opinion and FBI Report were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request to change his RE code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant's...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request to change his RE code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant's...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's daughter’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit...