Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903199
Original file (9903199.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  99-03199
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

Applicant requests that  his  undesirable  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office  evaluated  applicant's  request  and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C).  The advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).  Applicant's daughter’s
response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau  of  Investigation
(FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia,  provided  an  investigative  report
which is attached at Exhibit F.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.  Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to  which  entitled,  appropriate
regulations were not  followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Mr. Jackson A.  Hauslein,
and Mr. Richard M. McCormick considered this application on  10 August
2000 in accordance with the provisions of Air  Force  Instruction  36-
2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.



                                        PATRICK R. WHEELER
                                  Panel Chair
Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
  E. Applicant's Daughter’s Response
  F. FBI Report

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101405

    Original file (0101405.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 July 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 9902510

    Original file (9902510.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Members of the Board Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, and Ms. Marilyn Thomas considered this application on 18 April 2001 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000522

    Original file (0000522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a report of Applicant’s arrest record (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that relief should be granted. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 May 00.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803108

    Original file (9803108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900220

    Original file (9900220.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002452

    Original file (0002452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of error in his discharge case. However since the discharge occurred over 43 years ago and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803511

    Original file (9803511.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts that warrant an upgrade of his discharge he received. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000004

    Original file (0000004.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00004 INDEX CODE: A50.00, A50.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9901344

    Original file (9901344.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01344 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100838

    Original file (0100838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Jun 95, applicant was notified that his commander was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The Board requested applicant provide additional evidence pertaining to his post-service activities (Exhibit G). We note the letters of recommendation provided from applicant’s Military Personnel Records from 1995.