RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01869
INDEX CODE 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his 15 May 1969 under other than honorable
conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report, which is
attached at Exhibit C.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion and FBI Report were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit F.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Mr. Christopher
Carey, and Mr. John E. Pettit considered this application on 1
November 2001, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. FBI Report
D. Advisory Opinion
E. Ltrs, SAF/MIBR and AFBCMR Forwarding Advisory Opinion and
FBI Report
F. Applicant's Response
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, the applicant is a former member who was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 27 September 1957, under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness). ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF FBI REPORT: A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00600
On 16 August 2001, the applicant submitted a similar appeal to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). On 21 November 2002, the AFDRB concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03318
In support of his application he submits his personal statement, seven letters of character reference, a copy of his WD AGO Form 53- 59, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Undesirable Discharge, a copy of the special court martial order, and a copy of his discharge order. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B. FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-03318 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02041
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02041 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dismissal from the Air Force be upgraded to honorable. c. On 17 Dec 85, the applicant submitted a resignation in lieu of court-martial (RILO) request. On 13 Aug 87, the Secretary of the Air Force...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.