SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 94-03273
INDEX CODE 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 13 June 1995, the Board considered and, by a majority vote, denied
applicant’s request to void the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF)
prepared for the Calendar Year 1992B (CY92B) Central Lieutenant
Colonel Board and provide him Special Selection Board (SSB)
consideration. The applicant provided additional evidence and
requested the Board reconsider his application. On 29 January 1996,
the Board considered the documentation and voted to correct the
applicant’s records by voiding the contested PRF and providing him SSB
consideration. Applicant was considered and not selected by SSB on 4
May 1996. A copy of the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings (ROP),
with attachments, is at Exhibit J.
The applicant now requests that a PRF be reaccomplished and he be
provided SSB consideration for the CY92B board. He bases his request
on the fact that his record was not “constructed to appear as it would
have been had it met the original board.” His latest submission is at
Exhibit K.
An advisory opinion was obtained from the Air Force addressing this
issue and is provided at Exhibit L.
The applicant provided a rebuttal, which is at Exhibit N.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s
submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s latest request
should be granted. His contentions are duly noted; however, we do not
find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive
to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. He has not
provided a reaccomplished PRF, as is his responsibility. The AF Form
77 merely reflects that the PRF is not available. We therefore agree
with the recommendations of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale
expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he
has suffered either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 March 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit J. Addendum to ROP, dated 7 Feb 96, w/atchs.
Exhibit K. DD Form 149, dated 29 May 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit L. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPA, dated 8 Jul 98.
Exhibit M. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 Jul 98.
Exhibit N. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Nov 98.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-03273A
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 94-03273 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 13 June 1995, the Board considered and, by a majority vote, denied applicant’s request to void the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the Calendar Year 1992B (CY92B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Board and provide...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-06562A
On 27 Sep 94, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that he be given SSB consideration by the CY92B Lieutenant Colonel Board, which convened on 16 Nov 92 (see AFBCMR 93- 06562), with Exhibit A through D). A complete copy of the DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit G. The Selection Board Secretariat, AFPC/DPPB, reviewed the applicant’s submission and addressed the portion of his appeal pertaining...
On 27 Sep 94, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that he be given SSB consideration by the CY92B Lieutenant Colonel Board, which convened on 16 Nov 92 (see AFBCMR 93- 06562), with Exhibit A through D). A complete copy of the DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit G. The Selection Board Secretariat, AFPC/DPPB, reviewed the applicant’s submission and addressed the portion of his appeal pertaining...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-00856A
Applicant is now requesting that he receive a direct promotion to the grade of colonel as if selected by the Calendar Year 1993A (CY93A) Central Colonel Selection Board. Applicant’s 10 October 1997 letter and complete submission, to include Evidentiary Support - Illegal Selection Boards, is attached at Exhibit I. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Operations, Selection Board Secretariat, HQ AFPC/DPPB, states that they do not...
Applicant is now requesting that he receive a direct promotion to the grade of colonel as if selected by the Calendar Year 1993A (CY93A) Central Colonel Selection Board. Applicant’s 10 October 1997 letter and complete submission, to include Evidentiary Support - Illegal Selection Boards, is attached at Exhibit I. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Operations, Selection Board Secretariat, HQ AFPC/DPPB, states that they do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1996-10007A
[Examiner’s Note: A number of officers during this time frame had their performance records and PRFs reevaluated by independent senior raters and Management Level Evaluation Board (MLEB) presidents because of the original senior raters’ inappropriate use of PME and advanced academic education information. A copy of the Addendum ROP (AROP) is at Exhibit G. In a 10 Feb 05 appeal, the applicant requests reconsideration contending he would have been promoted if his squadron commander...
RESUME OF CASE: On 17 August 1995, the Board considered and approved the applicant's request that his PRF for the P0591B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be replaced with a reaccomplished "Promote" PRF and that he be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration. Applicant is asserting that the Board failed to provide complete relief in its original decision, and that the promotion selection boards that considered his record were not held in compliance with law and...
_________________________________________________________________ The applicant has submitted a letter, dated 15 October 1997, requesting that she receive a direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as if selected by the Calendar Year 1994 (CY94) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. Applicant’s numerous contentions concerning the statutory compliance of the central selection boards, illegal Officer Performance Report (OPR) restrictions, a tainted Promotion Recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1995-02111A
_________________________________________________________________ The applicant has submitted a letter, dated 15 October 1997, requesting that she receive a direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as if selected by the Calendar Year 1994 (CY94) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. Applicant’s numerous contentions concerning the statutory compliance of the central selection boards, illegal Officer Performance Report (OPR) restrictions, a tainted Promotion Recommendation...
- -obs, and recommended placed in A compiete copy of the evaluation 1s attached at Exhibit K O APPLICANT'S REVIEW OE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and has provided her response which is attached at Exhibit M. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Essentially applicant requests chat the contested Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1996 bp removed and replaced with a reaccomplished report reflecting her grade as lieutenant colonel with no indication...