RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01486
INDEX CODE: 131.00, 111.01
COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reserve Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) be considered by the Special
Selection Boards (SSBs) for the Calendar Years 1995 (CY95) through 1998B
Major Line Central Selection Boards.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Counsel states, in part, that the refusal by the Air Force Personnel Center
to permit consideration of these reports is an insult to the Reserve
components of the Air Force. The Reserve component reports are regarded as
unworthy of consideration by an SSB that is created by statute to correct
improper denial of prior consideration. Faced with no performance
evaluations for the periods of time in question, the applicant has
determined that including these Reserve records is preferable. In the case
of a Reserve report which reflects promotion, SSB members will know that
their decision in scoring his file will only adjust his date of rank to an
earlier date.
In support of his appeal, applicant submits counsel’s statement, copies of
his OPRs for the period beginning 28 September 1994 and ending 27 September
1998, a copy of Air Force Form 77, Supplemental Evaluation Sheet, for the
period 15 April 1992 through 27 September 1994 and other associated Reserve
records. Applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was considered and not selected for retention in the Air Force by
the FY93 RIF board, which convened on 20 Jul 92. Pursuant to the court
ordered settlement in the Berkley v. United States case, the CY04 Special
Board (SB) on 21 September 2004 overturned this action. He is now being
considered for promotion to the grade of major by the Calendar Year 1995A
through Calendar Year 1998B Major Line Central Selection Boards. He is
currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of lieutenant
colonel.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial of applicant’s request. AFPC/DPPPO states, in
part, that the Reserve record is just that, his Reserve record. Operating
under the premise that the applicant did not leave active duty, he would
not have a Reserve record and therefore, it should not be included for the
active duty promotion board for which he will be considered.
The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel states that during the period the applicant was not in an active
status, he was a Reserve officer. There are valid, probative reports
reflecting upon his performance and potential for the period after 1992.
The benchmark files against which he will be judged will not contain years
of non-rated time and requiring the applicant to compete under those
circumstances is to prejudge the outcome. Counsel further states that
consideration by the CY05 SB of these Reserve reports under these
circumstances is fair, reasonable and just. The Reserve records are
official Air Force documents with relevant information, the use of which
will prejudice no other individual.
Counsel’s response is at Exhibits D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice. Applicant’s counsel contends that the
applicant’s records have significant gaps and to not allow consideration of
his Reserve OPRs renders the SSB process futile. We agree. We note the
Air Force’s position that operating under the premise that the applicant
did not leave active duty, he would not have a Reserve record and therefore
should not be included for the active duty promotion board for which he
will be considered. We do not take issue with Air Force policy. However,
given the fact that the applicant is competing for promotion with a
substantial gap in his records through no fault of his own, we believe the
absence of OPRs for such an extensive period of time will deprive him of
full and fair consideration. In an effort to remove any possibility of an
injustice to the applicant in view of the totality of the circumstances of
this case, as an exception to policy, it is our opinion that his Reserve
Officer Performance Reports should be considered by the appropriate boards
for promotion to the grade of major by the CY05 Special Board. We do not
advocate placing the OPRs, en-masse, before each of the cited promotion
boards. Rather, we believe each of the reports should be accepted for file
for promotion by the cited active duty boards based on the report closeout
date and the date the original board convened.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. The Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1996A (4 March 1996) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
b. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1996, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
c. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1996, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
d. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1997, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1998B (6 April 1998) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-01486
in Executive Session on 11 May 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 3 May 05.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 May 05.
Exhibit E. Email, Counsel, dated 5 May 05.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01486
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating toxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that:
a. The Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1996A (4 March 1996) Major Line Special Central Selection
Board.
b. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1996, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Line Special Central Selection
Board.
c. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1996, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
d. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period beginning 28 September 1995 through 27 September
1997, and the Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 28 September 1994 through 27 September 1995, was
accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record, for consideration by the
Calendar Year 1998B (6 April 1998) Major Line Central Special Selection
Board.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00890
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a detailed response and additional documentary evidence which are attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02720
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2006-02720 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 March 2008 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) by the Calendar Year 2005A (CY05A) (6 Jul 05) (P0505A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central...
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the rater on the OPRs closing 23 November 1990, 23 November 1991, 23 November 1992, stating that the very nature of applicant‘s day-to-day duties has for many years been of such a highly classified nature that a great deal of his real accomplishments and duties simply could not be included in the Air Force evaluation system due to security restrictions. The statement from the rater of the OPRs rendered from 24 November 1 9 8 9...
Therefore, we recommend that her record, to include the “Definitely Promote” recommendation on the CY97C PRF, be considered for promotion to the grade of major by special selection board (SSB) for the CY97C Central Major Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Promotion Recommendation, AF Form 709,...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03010
However, they do recommend that all of the applicant’s OPRs closing on or after 1 May 01 be corrected to reflect the grade of major and placed on AF Form 707A. Additionally, during discussions with AFPC/DPPPEP on 10 Feb 06, we noted that while the substitute OPRs provided by the applicant have been changed to reference the grade of major, several still contain the same PME recommendations made on the Company Grade reports. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as...
c. The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) reviewed by the CY97C board reflect an overall recommendation of “Definitely Promote (DP).” 3. He was promoted by SSB to major with annotations on his top two OPRs, and subsequently promoted APZ to LTC with the AF Form 77 and four OPRs with annotations in his records. He contends, in part, that his unnecessary break in service and the annotated documents in his records caused the MLR board not to award him a “DP” on the CY97C PRF and the promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02409 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: RAYMOND J. TONEY HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for Calendar Years 1997C (CY97C) and 1998B (CY98B) Major Line Central Selection Boards (CSBs). A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1999-00530A
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s requests that his OPR rendered for the period 9 Jul 93 through 22 Aug 94 be declared void and removed from his records; his OPR rendered for the period 23 Aug 94 through 15 Jul 95 be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF prepared for consideration by the CY96A board be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF prepared for...
In regard to applicant's request that a PME statement be added on the OPR, closing 26 April 1996, AFPC/DPPPA, states that Central boards evaluate the entire officer selection record (OSR) (including the promotion recommendation form, OPRs, officer effectiveness reports, training reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, and officer selection brief), assessing whole person factors such as job performance, professional qualities, depth and breadth of experience, leadership, and academic and...