AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98- 00838
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of reenlistment be changed from 5 January 1 9 9 8 to
Bonus (SRB) .
25 January 1998, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was miscounseled. On 1 8 December 1 9 9 7 , a records review was
conducted for his reenlistment.
He requested to have his
reenlistment back dated to 25 January 1 9 9 8 , to receive the SRB.
The reviewer informed him that if there was a SRB during that
time his reenlistment would automatically be back dated.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of sergeant.
Applicant's Career Job Reservation (CJR) was to expire on 25
In December 1 9 9 7 , he requested his reenlistment
January 1 9 9 8 .
date be changed from 3 1 December 1 9 9 7 to 5 January 1 9 9 8 .
On 5
January 1 9 9 8 , he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period
for six years.
On 20 January 1 9 9 8 , the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was
approved in applicant's career field.
Since applicant had
reenlisted prior to this date, he was not authorized the SRB.
98-00838
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, Directorate of Personnel
Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this case and states
the applicant alleges miscounseling by the Military Personnel
Flight (MPF) regarding a change to his reenlistment date on the
basis that his career field was being reviewed for possible SRB
entitlement. However, he has provided no evidence to collaborate
this allegation. Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant's
request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 11 May 1998, for review and response within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
substantial evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
2
b
98- 00838
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 10 September 1998, under the provisions of
AFI 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 :
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita Maldonado, Member
Dr. Gerald Kauvar, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 1 4 9 , dated 2 3 February 1 9 9 8 , w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 24 April 1 9 9 8 .
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 11 May 1 9 9 8 .
Chair
3
e
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
2 4 APR 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR THE AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB, CA 78150-4712
The applicant is requesting his date of reenlistment be changed from 5 Jan 98 to 25 Jan
98 with subsequent entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRE3).
The applicant alleges miscounseling by the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding a
change to his reenlistment date on the basis that his career field was being reviewed for possible
SRE3 entitlement. However, he has provided no evidence &e. statement from MPF counselor) to
collaborate this allegation. As such, recommend disapproval of the request.
Chief, Skills $&nagement Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Mgmt
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant's eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant being miscounseled, he would need a constructive reenlistment and be entitled...
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). .” Another states “I know that I can reenlist rather than extend, but I have elected to execute this extension instead of reenlisting.” Both of these statements clearly indicate the applicant was aware of the reenlistment options.
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00838 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO RESUME OF CASE: On 10 September 1998, the Board considered applicant's request that his reenlistment date be changed from 1 5 January 1998 to 20 January 1998. The Board found insufficient evidence of a probable error or an injustice and denied the application. The applicant contends that he was miscounseled regarding his...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01464 3Uh 2 7 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: 2. t of the Air be corrected 998 and Chief Examiner Air Force Board for...
The evidence of record reflects that the applicant reenlisted on 1 Dec 98. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999.
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00187
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant’s eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-00020
Effective 18 December 1998, 48 hours after she had reenlisted, paralegals in Zone A and B (2 to 6 years and 6 years to 10 years) were eligible for a reenlistment bonus. She was further informed that while the Reenlistment Section cannot know what will be on the SRB lists, it is and should be their responsibility to explain the SRB facts to all personnel reenlisting. Had the applicant been counseled concerning the release of a new Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) listing in December and...
Effective 18 December 1998, 48 hours after she had reenlisted, paralegals in Zone A and B (2 to 6 years and 6 years to 10 years) were eligible for a reenlistment bonus. She was further informed that while the Reenlistment Section cannot know what will be on the SRB lists, it is and should be their responsibility to explain the SRB facts to all personnel reenlisting. Had the applicant been counseled concerning the release of a new Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) listing in December and...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 0 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00954 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His extension of enlistment on 15 June 1994 be canceled and he be reenlisted into the Regular Air Force for six years with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that the applicant was...
He received an approved Career Job Reservation (CJR) in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 3EOX2, with no Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and, he was honorably discharged effective 16 November 1997 and, on 1 7 November 1997, he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years. Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd Jul 2 1 , 1998 D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E AIR FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE E A S E TEXAS 2 2 JUN 1998 MEMORANDUM...