DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
JUN i 2 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-00376
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is
directed that:
of the Department of the Air Force relating to
be corrected to show that he was credited with an
y Training (IDT) points during the retirementhetention
tember 1993, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the
period 27 September 1992 through 26 September 1993 is a year of satisfactory Federal service
for retirement.
t
DONNA PITTENGER
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
4UFas 1 2 1998
zp-
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-00376
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force Evaluation and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant
has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in
AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his
designee.
F
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Ltr, HQ ARPUDPKA, dtd 5 Mar 98
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR RESERVE PERSONNEL CENTER
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
Command Dr., EE Wing, 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB MD 20762- 7002
FROM: HQ APRC/DPKA
6760 E Irvington P1 #2100
Denver CO 80280-2100
The requested correction cannot be accomplished administratively
1.
at this headquarters.
The applicant requests the period 27 September 1992 t o
2.
26 September 1993 reflect a good year.
He claims he was t o l d by his
unit recruiter he would not be able to attend any training until he
finished his technical training school
The following is an analysis of the circumstances surrounding this
3 .
case :
a. The applicant transferred from the United States Army Reserve
Therefore, from 27 September 1992 to 24 June 1993 of t h e period
According to the USAR
(USAR) into the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) on 25 June
1993.
in question, the applicant served in the USAR.
the applicant earned 14 Active Duty (AD) points,
Training ( I D T ) points and 0 Extension Course Institute (ECI) points.
16 Inactive Duty
b. The applicant did not participate for points while a member of
the USAFR from 25 June 1993 to 26 September 1993. A memorandum f r o m
the applicant's Military Personnel Flight acknowledges the applicant
was n o t allowed to participate until returning from technical training
school
4. We recommend this application be approved.
Had t h e applicant been
allowed to participate from 25 June 1993 to 2 6 September 1993 enough
points could have been earned f o r a satisfactory year of service. In
order to correct the applicant's record t h e board would have to award
five non- paid IDT points for retention/retirement year 27 September
1992 to 26 September 1993. The applicant's recgrd would t h e n show 14
AD points, 21 I D T points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points and a
year of satisfactory Federal service.
2
If this application is disapproved, no f u r t h e r action is
5.
necessary.
If you have any questions, please contact Paulina Flynn at e-mail
lflynn@arpcmail.den.disa.mil or c a l l DSN 926-6012 o r t o l l .
6 .
address:
free 1-800-525-0102, extension 403.
~irector af Pemnnei Program Management
9800376
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AF'BCMR 97-02502 NOV o 4 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to rrected to show...
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that in early October 1992, the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section after being tr (NARS) from the National Guard, applicant applied dual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) and was approve program assignment. However, when the process of reassignment started, there was a four-month delay causing the applicant's inability to perform in his unit and earn the required number of retirement...
He was credited with 31 paid AD points and 29 paid IDT points during the retirementhetention year 27 February 1997 through 26 February 1998, resulting in 75 total points, and, that the period 27 February 1997 through 26 February 1998 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement. c. The applicant’s commander withdrew the discharge action on 3 May 1998, based on the Air Force Reserve Command’s recommendation advising that the applicant had not been afforded due process to progress...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and her deceased husband's available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Although assigned to a participating status, the points for a year of...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASH i N GTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97- 02706 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, khe decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The per Force relati show that sh inactive dut 22 August 19 points; and, is a year of rtment...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 506 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of thg Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: . two-week annual b. stated that was informed that would be awarded 1 point...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132
His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...