AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
7
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00143
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
L.
wm23 m?
Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement
Medal ( A A M ) , First Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in
Humanitarian Operations for the period 10 Dec 92 to 10 Oct 94.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C).
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basiz to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. David C.
Van Gasbeck, and Mr. Michael P. Higgins considered this
application on 17 June 1998, in accordance with the provisions of
Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10
U.S.C. 1552.
-+--fry-
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
/
-
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFRC/DPM
j55 ZND Street
Robins AFB GA 31098-1635
1 8 FEB
7 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7
c l
rn
a
is requesting award of the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM),
luster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period
Firs I.
10 Dec 92 to 10 Oct 94. IAW AFI 36-2803, Awards and Decoration Program,
and the AFRC Supplement, to be awarded the AAM for humanitarian
operations, members must have successfully completed I O missions in support
of humanitarian relief.
2. After careful review of the application and coordination with the 34gth Military
Personnel Flight, Travis AFB CA, it was determined -was
reco nized with the award of the AAM for humanitarian operations on 4 Feb 93.
gh id not provide sufficient documentation to warrant approval for an
additional AAM for humanitarian reasons. Therefore, recommend disapproval of
the AAM for-
3. Questions may be addressed to HQ AFRCIDPMC, SMSgt Nailor, DSN
497-1 295.
MICHAEL W. LEHR, Colonel, USAF
Chief, Military Personnel Division
Directorate of Personnel
98001 43
t I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 1 2 4 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , Fourth Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 7 Dec 9 2 to 22 Mar 9 4 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. i- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. After careful review of the application and coordination with the 34gth Military Personnel Flight, Travis AFB CA, it was determined s - the award of the AAM...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00138 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO L. Applicant requests L a t he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , Third Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 10 Nov 91 to 25 Oct 93. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit...
DOCKET NUMBER: - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: 98- 00142 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , First Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 1 4 Jan 93 to 8 Dec 9 3 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. L. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE .MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO SEP 1 6 Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM), for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 30 December 1992 to 30 June 1994. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). As noted...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00969
United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) major command (MAJCOM) denied this award on grounds that he was a flight surgeon and thus considered no more than a passenger on these flights, while other flight surgeons (assigned to different commands) were awarded this medal during the same period for participating on the same flight missions. HQ USAFE supplemented this regulation with additional criteria, to be applied to regularly assigned aircrew members, but not to flight surgeons. ...
United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) major command (MAJCOM) denied this award on grounds that he was a flight surgeon and thus considered no more than a passenger on these flights, while other flight surgeons (assigned to different commands) were awarded this medal during the same period for participating on the same flight missions. HQ USAFE supplemented this regulation with additional criteria, to be applied to regularly assigned aircrew members, but not to flight surgeons. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00849 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Education/Training Report (TR), rendered for the period 2 Jun 92 through 27 Sep 93, be replaced with the revised TR provided, which include squadron commander comments on his performance as a flight commander. ++ Top report at the...