Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800138
Original file (9800138.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NUMBER:  98-00138 

COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

L. 

Applicant  requests  L a t  he  be  awarded  the  Aerial  Achievement 
Medal  ( A A M ) ,   Third  Oak  Leaf  Cluster,  for  his  support  in 
Humanitarian Operations for the period  10 Nov  91 to  25 Oct  93. 
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

The  appropriate Air  Force office  evaluated  applicant's request 
and provided  an advisory opinion to  the Board  recommending the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C). 
The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available evidence of  record, we  find  insufficient evidence of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was  denied rights to which 
entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed, -_ or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 
Members  of  the  Board  Mr.  David  W.  Mulgrew,  Mr.  Frederick  R. 
Beaman 111, and Mr. Joseph G. Diamond considered this application 
on 16 June 1998,  in accordance with the provisions of Air Force 
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3   and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

Panel Chair 

Exhibits: 

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  AFBCMR L t r   Forwarding Advisory Opinion 

- 
I-  - 

*- 

, . 

. ,, 

. 

! 

p $  FEB W8 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND 

MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 

FROM:  HQ AFRCIDPM 
i 55 ZND Street 
Robins AFB GA 31 098-1635 

requesting award of  the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM), 

1.  -is 
Third Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 
10 Nov 91 to 25 Oct 93.  IAW AFI 36-2803, Awards and Decoration Program, 
and the AFRC Supplement, to be awarded the AAM for  humanitarian 
operations, members must have successfully completed 10 missions in support 
of humanitarian relief. 

- 

2.  After careful review of the application and coordination with the 34gth Military 
Personnel Flight, Travis AFB CA,  it was determined -was 
recognized 

with the award of the AAM for humanitarian operations on 29 Sep 93. = 
= did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant approval for an 

additional AAM for humanitarian reasons.  Therefore, recommend disapproval of 
the AAM for 

3.  Questions may be addressed to HQ AFRC/DPMC, SMSgt Nailor, DSN 
497-1295. 

MICHAEL W. LEHR, Colonel, USAF 
Chief, Military Personnel Division 
Directorate of Personnel 

98001 38 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800142

    Original file (9800142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: 98- 00142 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , First Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 1 4 Jan 93 to 8 Dec 9 3 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. L. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800143

    Original file (9800143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , First Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 10 Dec 92 to 10 Oct 94. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful review of the application and coordination with the 34gth Military Personnel Flight, Travis AFB CA, it was determined -was reco nized...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800141

    Original file (9800141.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. After careful review of the application and coordination with the 34gth Military Personnel Flight, Travis AFB CA, it was determined s - the award of the AAM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800124

    Original file (9800124.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    t I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 1 2 4 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , Fourth Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 7 Dec 9 2 to 22 Mar 9 4 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. i- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9702284

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702284

    Original file (9702284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800128

    Original file (9800128.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE .MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO SEP 1 6 Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM), for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 30 December 1992 to 30 June 1994. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). As noted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800246

    Original file (9800246.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Have added an additional entry o f 'I23 Apr 83 - Unit Weapon Systems Officer RF-4Co1l A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals & SSB Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPA, also evaluated this appeal and disagrees with the applicant's contention that the selection board may have thought he was not concerned about his promotion because of the Board Discrepancy Report in his selection folder. 3 98-00246 A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02694

    Original file (BC-2004-02694.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. His former commander’s defamatory statements resulted in his making an Air Force IG complaint alleging his former commander made false statements and that his record did not contain anything showing his conduct, performance or behavior were less than desirable. The AFBCMR Letter is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT”S RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: In response to the Board’s request, the applicant indicated he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02899

    Original file (BC-2004-02899.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02899 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: Mr. Barry P. Steinberg HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Records (OSR) prepared for the 21 Sep 04 Special Board be corrected to include the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) first oak leaf cluster (1OLC) awarded for the period 16 May 92...