AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
b
DOCKET NO: 97-03016 JJN 1 2 1998
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes c
Applicant requests his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be
changed so he may reenlist. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit
A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error o r injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Robert W. Zook
and Ms. Olga M. Crerar considered this application on 11 June 1998
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603
and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
"-TT--y
f-4
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
HEADOUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPUDPPAES
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78 1 50-471 2
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Recor
0 2 DEC 1997
1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 .
A review of applicant’s case file was conducted. Tlie Reenlistment Eligibility (RE)
Code “2P” is correct. The type of discharge drove assignment of the RE code.
s
KATHLEEN R. LOPEZ, MSG, 6
Special Programs and BCMR Manager
Dir of Personnel Program Management
.
~
~
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
I
i
U.S. AIR FORCE
I ~
s,,
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West Ste 11
Randolph AFB 7X 78 150-47 13
i
DEC 1 6 887
1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was discharged fiom the Air Force
07 Jul82 under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Marginal Performer Assigned to Initial Training)
with an honorable discharge. He served 21 days total active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting a change in his reenlistment code so he can
reenlist into the armed serlices.
Basis for Request. Applicant claims that he went to a master sergeant to get a humanitarian
discharge because his sister was going through separation anxiety (he was the only male in the
family). The MSgt told him to return in one week if his sister did not get any better. He states
he tried to see him again and was refused by his technical instructor (?r). As a result, he was
sent for a psychiatric evaluation (why he’s still wondering) and was given an honorable
discharge.
Facts. - On 02 Jul82, applicant was notified by his commander that involuntary discharge
action had been initiated against him for his marginal performauce. Commander indicated the
applicant’s inability to adapt to training precludes his successful acquisition of required basic
military training rudiments. Applicant possesses a personality disorder which prevents him fiom
accepting discipline and prevents him fiom serving successfully as a member of the Armed
Forces. He received a “U” in attitudeladaptability in his initial week of training. He was referred
to the mental health clinic where he was diagnosed as having an Avoiding Personality Disorder.
The interview Mer revealed the applicant had mild thoughts of suicide and also contemplates
thoughts of mutilating his father. The applicant was advised that he had a right to consult legal
counsel and to submit written statements in his own behalf. Applicant waived his right to legal
counsel and elected not to submit statements in his own behalf. The discharge authority
reviewed the case and on 07 JulS2, approved the discharge as a marginal performer and directed
that he be given an honorable discharge.
Discussion. This case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or
irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. The reason for discharge is appropriate and
complies with directive.in effect at the .time of his discharge. The records indicate member’s
military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
Recommendation. Applicant did not ident@ any specific errors in the discharge processing
nor provide .facts which warrant a change in his narrative reason for separation. Accordingly, we
recommend applicant’s request be denied. He has not fded a timely request.
, GS-9
i d / g -
$ i
OFIN C. WOO
Military Personnel Mgmt Spec
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant did not provide a rebuttal by the suspense date and subsequently officials in the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force approved the findings of the previous two boards and directed the applicant’s discharge with severance pay and a 10 percent disability rating. This code was correct at the time of his discharge.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-01826 (Case 2) COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO I Applicant requests that the narrative reason for separation be changed from marginal performer to convenience of the government; that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2P be change to a 1; and that his separation code of JEM be changed. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01199 COUNSEL: NONE The applicant requests that his separation from the Air Force be changed from "Entry Level Separation" to "Honorable. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions DEPARTMENT O F T H E AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS A I R FORCE P E R S O N N E L CENTER RANDOLPH A I R FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13 The applicant, while serving...
The applicant states personnel at the Military Personnel Flight erroneously completed an AF Form 964 and updated this data (MPF) at which indichted he refbsed to get retainability for a PCS to the CONUS. Further, he states that he visited the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) on 12 Sep 97 where he was “promoted” to SSgt in an impromptu ceremony. Recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to reflect that he was promoted to staff sergeant effective and with DOR of 1 Sep 97.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 9 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03481 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4M be changed, and, that he be advised as to the meaning of his narrative reason for separation of "Defective Enlistment Agreement." The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The applicant is...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West Ste I1 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-471 3 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of...