Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702973
Original file (9702973.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
- 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  97-02973 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

t  requests  that  his  DD  Form  214  be  corrected  to  include: 
Expeditionary  Medal  (Armed  Forces  Expeditionary  Medal) ,  Air 
Force  Outstanding  Unit  Award,  Vietnam  Service  Medal,  Air  Force  Good 
Conduct Medal  ( 6 6 - 6 3 )   and  ( 6 6 - 6 5 ) ,  Air  Force Longevity  Service Award, 
Armed  Forces  Reserve  Medal  (Air  Force)  and  Air  Reserve  Forces 
Meritorious Service Medal.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 
The  appropriate  Air  Force  office  evaluated  applicant's  request  and 
provided  an advisory opinion to the Board  recommending the application 
be  denied  (Exhibit  C). 
The  advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  for  review  and  response  (Exhibit D).  As  of  this  date,  no 
response has been received by this office. 
After  careful  consideration of  applicant's  request  and  the  available 
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice 
to  warrant  corrective  action.  The  facts  and  opinions  stated  in  the 
advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have 
not  been  rebutted by  applicant.  Absent  persuasive  evidence  59plicant 
was  denied  rights to which  entitled, appropriate  regulations were  not 
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

 

.

The  Board  staff  is  directed  to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision. 
Applicant  should also be  informed that this decision is final and will 
only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  presentation  of  new  relevant  evidence 
which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the  application  was 
.
filed. 
Members  of  the  Board  Ms.  Patricia  J.  Zarodkiewicz,  Mr.  Jackson  A. 
Hauslein,  and  Ms.  Dorothy  P.  Loeb  considered  this  application  on 
25 June 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 
36-2603 and the governing statute, 1 0  U.S.C. 1552. 

Panel Cha 

Exhibits: 

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900993

    Original file (9900993.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request concerning the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101698

    Original file (0101698.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records were administratively corrected by the Air Force Personnel Center to reflect award of the Distinguished Flying Cross and Air Force Commendation Medal. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied with respect to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003282

    Original file (0003282.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0001684

    Original file (0001684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801432

    Original file (9801432.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01432 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES JAN 13m ' Applicant requests that he be awarded the Armed Forces Medal (AFEM) , or other appropriate expeditionary Expeditionary medal, for his service in direct support of operations in Grenada between 23 October 1983 and 21 November 1983. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101160

    Original file (0101160.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903345

    Original file (9903345.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101651

    Original file (0101651.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01598

    Original file (BC-2003-01598.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01598 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the Aerial Achievement Medal, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Enlisted Aircrew Badge. In...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801825

    Original file (9801825.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). Applicant requests DD Form 214 reflect his Vietnam Service by adding the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.