AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02609
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MAY 1 4 1998
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Six (6) points (no pay) be added to her record for the period of
11 June 1992 to 10 June 1993 for one (1) year of satisfactory
service.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Upon joining the unit she was not briefed on the USAFR and ANG
unique retirement and retention (R&R) dates, retirement point
system, or satisfactory service requirements.
Therefore,
according to her records, she did not obtain the minimum 50
points for a satisfactory year. She states she earned 44 of the
50 required points.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 10 June 1992, the applicant was discharged from active duty
and transferred to the Obligated Reserve Section (ORs).
On 16 January 1993, she joined the 419 FW Reserves and her
Retention/Retirement (R/R) date was established as 10 Jun.
During the RYE 16 January 1993, she earned 13 active duty points,
16 inactive duty training points and 15 membership points for a
total of 44 points. The RYE 16 January 1993 was not credited as
a satisfactory year of service because at least 50 points are
required.
.
97-02609
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPKB, reviewed
the application and states that after several conversations with
419 MSS/DPMP, it was discovered that before a member is assigned
to the unit they are briefed on the R/R year requirements and the
points requirement as well as satisfactory service requirement.
419 MSS/DPMP also stated that a checklist is filled out upon
checking into the unit and that it indicated the briefing had
been accomplished. The checklist is filed in the member's folder
Therefore, they recommend denial of
for only one year.
applicant's request based on the letter from the unit stating the
member was briefed on the requirement needed to have a
satisfactory year of Federal service.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and states that had
she been briefed, there are a few options she could have
considered to obtain the necessary points.
For example, she
could have accomplished her annual tour before her R/R date which
is 10 Jun (she did her 14 days of annual tour at home station in
Aug 93, 2 months later). She states that she was counseled by the
Air Force Reserve Command Representative and informed that she
had been miscounseled by her MPF representative and should submit
her request for review on a DD Form 149. She further states that
she submitted statements from individuals showing that:
a. In 1993 there was not a checklist for new members to sign
indicating they had received a Retirement and Retention briefing.
Also at the present time, there is not a checklist for new
members to sign indicating they have received a Retirement and
Retention briefing.
b. The record review rip was and still is the only document
that is filed in a new member's personnel folder. This document
is always signed by the member upon receiving the record review
and briefing.
c. The initial record review rip does list the member's
Retirement and Retention date but, Customer Service technicians
had no written format on what information to brief or how in-
depth to brief the data.
d. Not all Customer Service Technicians receive thorough and
adequate training on conducting an initial record review or
explaining the R/R data section to new members.
2
8
97-02609
e. All members do not receive an initial records review
which is when the R/R data is supposed to be briefed.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice . After
reviewing the evidence of record, we believe the possibility
exists that applicant was not fully aware of the requirements of
obtaining satisfactory year of Federal service at the time she
joined the Air Force Reserves. We note that once applicant was
properly briefed, she has received sufficient points to obtain
satisfactory years of Federal service. In view of the above, and
in an effort to off set any possibility of an injustice, we
recommend her records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was credited
with an additional six (6) nonpaid inactive duty points during
the retirement/retention year 11 June 1992 through 10 June 1993,
resulting in 50 total points; and, that the period 11 June 1992
through 10 June 1993 is a year of satisfactory Federal service
for retirement.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 March 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Ms. Sophie A. Clark, Member
Mr. Steven A. Shaw. Member
~ m- Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
3
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Aug 97.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPKB, dated 16 Oct 97.
Exhibit D. AFBCMR Letter, dated 1 0 Nov 97.
Exhibit E. Applicant's Response, dated 21 Nov 97, w/atchs.
Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
97- 02609
THOMAS S. MARKKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
MAY 1 4 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR. 97-02609
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
be corrected to show that she was credited with an addi
points during the retiremendretention year 11 June 1992 through 10 June
1993, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the period 11 June 1992 through 10 June 1993 is a
year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
c/ Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AF'BCMR 97-02502 NOV o 4 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to rrected to show...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 506 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of thg Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: . two-week annual b. stated that was informed that would be awarded 1 point...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASH i N GTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97- 02706 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, khe decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The per Force relati show that sh inactive dut 22 August 19 points; and, is a year of rtment...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00032 INDEX CODE: 135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JULY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her mother receive the retirement pay her father did not collect, as well as survivor benefits. Applicant’s father did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service and is not eligible for...
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
At the completion of the course of treatment she was found fit for full duty and released from active duty back to the Air Force Reserve. No Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was initiated at this time to determine her fitness for duty and AFRES started administrative discharge action under the provisions of AFI 36-3209. Also, in September 1996, ARPC/DPAD terminated discharge action and cleared her to return to active participating status with an assignment limitation code 7 96-0 1447 of...
The Reserve Order, dated 6 May 98, assigning the applicant to the numbered MSS showed an R/R date of 18 Sep. After an audit of his Master Personnel Record, his R/R date was changed to 22 Sep. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded five non-pay points for R/R year 22 Sep 97 to 21 Sep 98 in order to have this year credited as a good year toward retirement. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00035 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be considered by a Special Board (SB) in lieu of the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Board (U0511B) that was conducted at Headquarters (HQ) Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) on 13...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01365
In their assessment of her claim, the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant’s claim concerning the base closing and has recommended her request for credit for a satisfactory year of Federal service for the RYE 4 January 1994 be approved. Since the applicant did not participate a full year towards an active duty retirement, the year cannot be counted as a satisfactory year of federal service. Accordingly, in the absence of evidence indicating she was treated...