.
.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02318
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
-
Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that
he was considered for promotion to the grade of senior master
sergeant (E-8) for the 9538 cycle. 'Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office (AFPC/DPPPWB) evaluated
applicant I s request and provided an initial advisory opinkon to
the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) .
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review
and response (Exhibit D) . Applicant's response to the advisory
opinion is at Exhibit E.
Pursuant to the Board's request , AFPC/DPPPWB provided an
additional advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit F).
The
additional advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for
review and response (Exhibit G ) . As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Mr. Patrick R.
Wheeler, and Mr. William E. Edwards considered this application
on 1 Dec 98
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force -
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicantis DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D.
E. Applicant's Response
F. Additional Advisory Opinion
G.
SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated the request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit G). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit I.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant’s last two known addresses for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's remaining requests and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant further corrective action.
Funds allotted for payment of air mechanics are continued i n force u n t i l authorization for increased grades is received and conversion made i n compliance w i t h instructions above mechanics ratings t o noncommissioned grades is based on the fund8 allotted In t o the Air Corps f o r air mechanics grades within t h e present fiscal year. SUBJECT: TO : ,Appointment of' Air Mechanics t o Grades' Cammanding Generals, Army Air Forces, Army Ground Forces, Services of Supply, Armies, Army...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 24 Mar 00 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this application and indicated that, he is of the...
The appropriate Air Force o f f i c e evaluated applicarit ‘ s request ana provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . T r. 0 additional evaluation was forwarded to applicant f c r re-Jie+; ar,d comment (Exhibit G ’ i . Applicant’s response to the additional evaluation is at Exhibit H. The appropriate After careful consiaeratio~ cf applicant's r e q u e...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be granted on the basis of clemency, if a check of his Federal Bureau of Investigation, (FBI) record proves negative (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02285 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.05 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade be corrected from technical sergeant (E-6) to master sergeant (E-7), effective 2 September 1945. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. Applicant’s Response DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE SAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 31 January 2000 FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPPR 550 C Street West Ste 12 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714 SUBJECT:...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01236
Amendment SO ACD-00565, dated 26 January 2007 pertaining to applicant's placement on the temporary retired file, effective 20 January 2007 reflects he retired in the projected higher grade of SSgt. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...