e---
**
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 94-02679
8. /3
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
JAN 3 1 1995
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT :
His records be corrected to show that a waiver for advance pay
was approved as a result of Operation Fiery Vigil.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT :
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Staff.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
A I R STAFF EVALUATION:
DFAS-DE/FYDEC reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
4
r
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
3 .
demonstrate the existence of probable injustice. After thorough
evaluation of the application submitted, we find that the
applicant was affected financially by the volcanic eruption in
the Philippines and took substantial losses in relocating his
dependents. It is true that he did not file for waiver of the
advance pay within the time frame of 10 May 1991 through
31 December 1991; however, to offset any injustice to the
applicant, we believe that he should be entitled to the waiver of
repayment of one month's advance pay. Therefore, we recommend
that his records be corrected as indicated herein.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
of the Department of the Air Force
The pertinent
, be corrected to show that he
relating to
applied f o r advance pay on 10 June 1991 and received a waiver of
the advance pay up to one month of basic pay as authorized by
Section 1006(c), Title 37, United States Code.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session under the provisions of AFR 31-3:
Beverly J. Hooper, Panel Chairman
John H. Lynskey, Member
David W. Mulgrew, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 10 Jun 94, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS-DE/FYDEC, dtd 1 Aug 94.
Panel khairman
(Exhibit D) In an application dated 29 August 1990, the applicant requested that (1) he be promoted to master sergeant (E-7), (2) he be reinstated into active duty, (3) the time out of the service be counted towards retirement, (4) he receive all back pay and allowances, and (5) the portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus, which was recouped, be reimbursed. On 16 July 1991, the Board considered and recommended granting the applicant’s request for a service retirement from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-04682
(Exhibit D) In an application dated 29 August 1990, the applicant requested that (1) he be promoted to master sergeant (E-7), (2) he be reinstated into active duty, (3) the time out of the service be counted towards retirement, (4) he receive all back pay and allowances, and (5) the portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus, which was recouped, be reimbursed. On 16 July 1991, the Board considered and recommended granting the applicant’s request for a service retirement from the Air Force...
As a Many took an advance later received a waiver of one month’s basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. The criteria used in determining eligibility for waiver of the advance pay is the member had to have been stationed in the area during the June time frame, and he had to have received an advance between June 1 and December 31, 1991. . Should the Board choose to approve the request, the applicant's records can be corrected to show that the applicant received the advance...
3 AFBCMR 96- 01136 Therefore, if the AFBCMR overturns his court-martial action, he would only be entitled to have his former grade of airman reinstated with an effective date and date of rank of 3 May 72. Concerning the applicant's request that his court- martial conviction be overturned, we note that 10 USC 1552(f) limits this Board to correction of a record to reflect actions taken by the reviewing official and action on the sentence of a court-martial for the purpose of clemency. ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02029
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
Many evacuees who took an advance later received a waiver of one month's basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION: The Chief , Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, evaluated this and confirms that the applicant was stationed at rom 10' November 1989 through 9 June 1991. was advanced $ 1991 while he was stationed a A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
Based on input from the Retraining Section at AFMPC, the applicant received approved CAREERS retraining into AFSC 115x0 (which was authorized a Zone A, Multiple One-Half SRB) on 4 February 1993, prior to his reenlistment in AFSC 361x1. DPMAPE recommended denial of the applicant's request to have the recouped SRB reinstated. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
&&e Director v Air Force Review Boards Agency I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS NOv2 3 7998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 7 - 0 3 3 2 1 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a waiver of her government property lost or damaged (GPLD) indebtedness of $ 2 8 6 . While we note that applicant's request for a waiver of indebtedness does not constitute an erroneous payment of pay and allowances, we believe a remission...
He elected retired pay based on the ten percent disability rating; thus, his former spouse received no disposable retired pay. After reviewing all of the evidence, the Formal PEB found the applicant physically unfit for military service and recommended temporary retirement with a compensable rating of 80 percent for the diagnoses of: (1) Primary degenerative dementia with severe impairment of social and industrial adaptability; (2) Reactive airway disease exacerbated by chronic sinusitis;...