AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
JUL 2 7 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
- -
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00529
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
He be paid one month’s basic pay like other Fiery Vigil evacuees.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
evacuee, his advanced pay should be forgiven.
As a
Many
took an advance later received a waiver of one
month’s basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. This did
not happen to him. He was first told his request for a debt
waiver was approved; in actuality, he is repaying the debt
because he happened to take the advance too late.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Following the eruption of
in June 1991, many Air
Force members assigned to
ase suffered extensive
financial and material losses
mbers were offered advanced pay
to help defray the cost of reconstituting their homes and
belongings. Many members took advantage of the advanced pay with
the understanding that they would have to repay the advance as a
normal debt.
-
. - -
.
Subsequently, the Secretary of the Air Force approved a waiver
equal-to one month’s basic-pay fo
Air F e members e
and from
This meant that th
have to repay one month’s pay. To qualify for the waiver, members
had to receive the advance pay within a specific time frame.
panied and unacco
Air Base because
se of Hurricane
taking the advanced pay
..
DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION:
AFB from 2
The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, evaluated this
'cation and confirms that the applicant was stationed at
ril 1990 through 29 November 1991. The
B occurred on 10 June 1991. To qualify
'cant had to have received his advance
between 1 June and 31 December 1991; however, he received his
advance on 4 February 1992. They recommend denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
[The ChieE, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, informally advised the
AFBCMR Staff on. 1 July 1998 that applicant's base pay during the
relevant period was $2,643.00.1
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the evaluation and provided a response,
indicating that he has repeatedly tried to rectify this problem
through DFAS. He should not be penalized because he was able to
"hold out" for an additional 35 days before taking the advance.
Applicant's rebuttal is at exhibit D.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
he existence of probably
any members assigned to
devastation received a
2. The application was timely filed.
3 . Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
or injustice. We are
Air Base during the
d pay and that the
Force subsequently waived the repayment of
. The applicant suffered the same hardships
evacuees and this Board has granted relief
to other applicants who applied for an advance outside the
allowable window. Therefore, based on equity, an injustice has
occurred and we are persuaded to grant one month's basic pay to
this applicant.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 June 1991,
2
98-00529
I .
he applied for and was authorized one month's advanced pay in the
amount of $2,643.00 by competent authority.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
under the provisions of AFI
Executive Session on 17 July 1998
36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Member
Mr. Benedict A. Kausal IV, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended
following documentary evidence was considered:
The
Exhibit A. DD Form
Exhibit B. Letter,
Exhibit C. Letter,
Exhibit D. Letter,
149, dated 27 Jan 98, w/atchs.
DFAS-DE/FYCC, dated 6 Apr 98.
AFBCMR, dated 20 Apr 98.
Applisant, dated 28 Apr 98.
\ CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
3
98-00529
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
DENVER CENTER
6760 E. IRVINGTQN PLACE
DENVER, COLORADO 80279
DFAS-DE/FYCC
RPR-
6 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F MILITARY RECORDS
ATTN: AFBCMR
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
We examined the application for correction of military
the relief sought, we are forwarding it for your consideration.
st is in connection with the
that erupted 10 June 1991.
volcano
requesting waiver of the balance of an advance pay and a refund
'of the collected portion of the advance for a total of $2,254.
His waiver was denied because it did not meet the criteria for
the waiver.
The applicant was stationed &t -Air
Base
during the period April 23, 1990, through November 29, 1991. The
applicant was sent temporary duty (TDY), safe haven, June 30,
through November 29, 1991. The member received the advance on
February 4, 1992. The application has not filed a timely
request.
The criteria used in determining eligibility for waiver of
the advance pay is the member had to have been stationed in the
area during the June time frame, and he had to have received an
advance between June 1 and December 31, 1991.
. .
__
9800529
We recommend denial of the application. Should the Board
choose to approve the request, the applicant's records can be
corrected to show that the applicant received the advance pay
prior to December 31, 1991.
Our address is DFAS-DE/FYCC, 6760 East Irvingto
Denver, Colorado 80279-7100. Our point of contact i
and she may be reached at DSN 926-4868, or c
(303) 676-4868.
. - .
. . _. . . .-
3,
..
. - . ,
.
--
. .
. .. - .. .
-
.
.
.
. . . . . . .. , -
LJb-6
Diana E. Settelmeyer
Chief, Claims Branch
Directorate of Debt and Claims
Management
9800529
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
JUL 2 7 l9%
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-00529
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
I -
ilitary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t-
e corrected to show that, on 30 June 1991, he applied for and was
's advanced pay in the amount of $2,643.00 by competent authority.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Many evacuees who took an advance later received a waiver of one month's basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION: The Chief , Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, evaluated this and confirms that the applicant was stationed at rom 10' November 1989 through 9 June 1991. was advanced $ 1991 while he was stationed a A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 024 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: E cords of the Department of the Air Force relatin , be corrected to show that on 9...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 2 4 JUL 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-02785 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: application was partially approved by competent authority in the amount of $78 1.25. rds of the Department of the Air Force relating...
This meant that those members taking the advance pay did not have to repay one month’s pay. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF DFAS EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and asserts his situation is no different than others who have received one month’s basic pay due to losses suffered from Hurricane Andrew. We are aware that many members assigned to Homestead Air Force Base during the Hurricane Andrew devastation received...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant states finance did not inform him of the method used to compute payment of accrued leave. The applicant separated from the.Air Force on May 15, 1997, and reentered active duty in the May 17, 1997.
I " AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' JUL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be paid for accrued leave not verified on his DD Form 214. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant claims that he did not take this leave and did not receive payment...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant is stating t h a t he s o l d 20 days of leave back to the United States Air Force upon separation August 16, 1997, but was never paid for the leave nor...
Applicant's The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IRVINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS- DE / FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for...
&&e Director v Air Force Review Boards Agency I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS NOv2 3 7998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 7 - 0 3 3 2 1 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a waiver of her government property lost or damaged (GPLD) indebtedness of $ 2 8 6 . While we note that applicant's request for a waiver of indebtedness does not constitute an erroneous payment of pay and allowances, we believe a remission...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action, The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. IRVINGTON...