AIR FORCE
IN THE MATTER OF:
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 1 2 1998
DOCKET "MBER: 96-0
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect the period 18 June through
7 July 1996 was permissive temporary duty (PTDY) rather than
ordinary leave.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her commander erroneously granted her permissive TDY prior to her
separation from active duty.
Two days prior to her final
outprocessing, her commander's error was discovered. Her commander
and Military Personnel Flight (MPF) chief told her to follow her
plans and leave as scheduled.
In support of her request, applicant provided a statement from her
commander who had erroneously approved the PTDY and copies of her
leave request/authorization. (Exhibit A)
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The available records reflect the applicant enlisted in the Regular
Air Force on 20 August 1992 for a period of four years. On 31 July
1996, she was honorably released from active duty, under the
provisions
-
miscellaneous/general reasons), and transferred to the Air Force
Reserve.
She is currently assigned to the Obligated Reserve
Section.
( voluntary
release
36-3208
of
AFI
The Commander's Programs Branch, AFPC/DPSFC, stated applicant's
master military pay account (MMPA) shows 20 days of excess leave
since applicant's days of leave exceeded the days accrued as of the
date of release from active duty on 31 July 1996. The MMPA shows
11 days of leave p r i o r to 18 June 1996; 20 days of leave 18 June -
7 July 1996 (which commander had erroneously approved as PTDY); and
24 days of terminal leave 8-31 July 1996. The MMPA shows applicant
had 11.5 days of leave on 1 October 1995 and earned 23 days.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Commander's Programs Branch, AFPC/DPSFC, reviewed this
application and recommended denial, stating the Transition
Assistance Management Program (TAMP) under 10 USC, Chapter 5 8 ,
provides for benefits and services for members being separated or
One of the benefits is PTDY fox job or
recently separated.
residence search.
TAMP-eligible members include certain
involuntary separatees, retirees, and separatees under the
voluntary separation incentive (VSI) or special separation benefit
(SSB) program.
Applicant separated under normal voluntary
separation provisions; therefore, she is not TAMP-eligible.
(Exhibit C)
The Transition Operations Branch, AFPC/DPPTT, recommended denial
stating
for
miscellaneous/general reasons. She voluntarily separated and was
not eligible for transition benefits. (Exhibit D)
applicant
released
was
from
active
duty
The Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, stated a review of applicant's
military pay record shows that she was on Ordinary Type A leave
18 Jun - 7 Jul 96, and on terminal leave 8-31 July 9 6 .
She did
incur a debt due to excess leave. (Exhibit E)
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 13 January 1 9 9 7 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
1.
law or regulations.
2 . The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable injustice.
In this regard, the
commander's erroneous permissive TDY authorization was not detected
until two days before applicant's scheduled departure. Had this
information been available to the applicant when she was
contemplating voluntary separation, and in view of the fact that
she would not have had sufficient accrued leave to cover the entire
career choice as
period,
to her actual separation date. In our opinion, it would be an
injustice to penalize the applicant for an error that should have
been detected when she initially began her outprocessing.
Therefore, to preclude any injustice to the applicant, we recommend
we believe she may have made a different
2
AFBCMR 96-02470
that the records be corrected to reflect the applicant was on
permissive TDY status rather than ordinary leave status during the
period in question.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that during the period
-18 June 1996 through 7 July 1996, she was in a permissive temporary
duty (PTDY) status rather than ordinary leave (Type A) status.
-
The following members of the Board considered this application in
AFI
Executive Session on 15 July 1997, under the provisions of
36-2603 :
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Ms. Sophie A. Clark, Member
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.
following documentary evidence was considered:
The
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C.
Exhibit D.
Exhibit E.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 13 Jan 97.
DD Form 149, dated 15 Aug 96, w/atchs.
Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Letter, AFPC/DPSFC, dated 1 Nov 96.
Letter, AFPC/DPPTT, dated 5 Nov 96.
Letter, DFAS-DE/FYCC, dated 23 Dec 96.
k ! m x 2 ; F
Panel Chair
3
AFBCMR 96-02470
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
JUN 1 2 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 96-02470
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
l
status.
d
itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
be corrected to show that during the period 18 June 1996 through 7 July
ssive temporary duty (PTDY) status rather than ordinary leave (Type A)
(/Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
U
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02864 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO A% 1 4 1998 APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was authorized 45 days of Permissive Temporary Duty (PTDY), and that 45 days of leave be restored to his current leave account. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided medical documentation pertaining to his baby daughter. After reviewing the available...
The AFPC disability office established a 10 Jan 97 separation date after authorizing 20 days processing time and 10 days PTDY and notified the Military Personnel Flight on 12 Dec 96. The leave history shows 5 days leave 16 - 20 Dec 96,20 days PTDY 21 Dec 96 - 9 Jan 97, and a negative leave balance of minus 11.5 days. FACTS: Applicant was involuntarily separated fiom the Air Force on 10 Jan 97 for physical disability under the provisions of AFI 36-3212.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00744 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: rtment of the Air Force be corrected to show that on 4 November 1996, but on that date, his enlistment of 5 November 1990 was extended for a period of 61...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01027
However, the CSS provided correct information to the applicant; according to para 12.3.11, unit commanders will "not authorize PTDY for house hunting enroute with PCS." In this respect, the Board notes that once the applicant arrived at his permanent duty location and signed in, the commander may approve up to eight days permissive leave. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
DPSFC stated that, if HQ AFPC/DPPRS agrees, the applicant’s retirement date should be changed from 1 Jul to 1 Sep 98. To grant the applicant additional active duty time to use 77 days of leave, his retirement date would have to be extended by 3 full months. Given the lost opportunity, and the change of circumstances, he was not even able to zero out the leave and permissive TDY days prior to 1 Jul 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01244
His wife and son remained hospitalized until 20 September 2002 and the applicant was ordered to return to Malstrom AFB on 21 September 2002. Consequently, the applicant could have been authorized PTDY for the period that his wife was hospitalized: 4 through 15 July 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01244 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02090
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP also recommends that the applicant be compensated for five days of leave. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Oct 02 for review and comment within 30 days. The Board agrees with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768
If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00496
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends denial because the applicant was not representing the Air Force in a DOD-sanctioned event or role. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). Had there been sufficient time for...
The letter advised the applicant, “provided she remain eligible, she would be considered for promotion by the next scheduled Major Board which will consist of entirely different members. If you are nonselected for promotion by the next board and will be retirement eligible on the mandatory separation date for that board (normally the last day of the sixth month after the board report is approved), you must retire on the first day of the seventh month after the board report is approved.” On...