NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8963 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘The Board, in its review of your application, considered all potentially mitigating factors presented in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8966 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8997 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8998 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative ‘separation by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct at which time you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8999-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and. Bronte f Stone MONT COMER ROBERT D. ZSALMAN . Acting Recorder Be Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR90-13
‘The Board, acting as a special board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Vogt, reviewed Subject’s case on 15 February 2013 and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Subject's naval record be corrected as follows: {1) Show career retirement points for each anniversary year (pro-rated for any partial years) he was removed from the RASL through his MRD of 1 January 2012 as follows: (a) Appropriate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9001 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to her enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9002 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. , The Board, in its review of your application, considered all potentially mitigating factors presented in your case. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of ‘probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9005 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9013 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9017 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9019 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected by removing derogatory material (nonjudicial punishment (NJP), administrative remarks (Page 11) counselling, et¢.) As a result, she did not return to her duty station until late afternoon on 17 August 2012. f. Enclosure (4), an AO from the HOMC Military Justice Branch, Judge advocate Division, regarding Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9025 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9029 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is - on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9033 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 1 October 2014. You waived your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9043 13
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), MIO, the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case, has commented to the effect that the request warrants partial relief, specifically, modification of the contested entry to remove “,which resulted in you being relieved for cause”. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9044 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 duly 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9045 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9058 13
d. In the AO from HOMC JAM (enclosure (4)), it was recommended that the page 11 entry remain in the record, but it should be redacted by removing all references to an adulterous affair with a CWO, and the investigation which resulted from this information. In this regard, the Board concludes that the page 11, although incorrectly written, should remain in the record but be redacted by removing all references regarding an inappropriate relationship with a “married” CWO and the investigation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9064 13
NR9064-13 14 Apr 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ‘Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to his enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR907 13
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your navel record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9072 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for a Household Goods (HHG) move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9074 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9084 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9085 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting removal of derogatory material from his naval record, specifically, two administrative remarks (page 11) entries dated 28 August and 1 September 2011, regarding his civil involvement charge of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. White-Olsen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9097 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded those factors were insufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code based on your non-recommendation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9101-13
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 30 March to 6 August 2012 or, as a second preference, modifying the report by removing, from block 41 (“Comments on Performance”), “detachment for cause.” “A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9103 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his original date of rank to sergeant to backdated to reflect 1 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9107 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9109 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9112 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a timely written request for Survivor Benefit Plan conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage within one year from the date of his divorce. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9114 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dtd 9 Apr 14, a copy of which ig attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9115 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment guarantees. d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9118 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. you waived your right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). The Board did not consider whether your character of service and narrative reason for discharge should be changed due to the fact that your discharge is less than 15 years old, so you must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9119 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with - this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding driving while impaired on or about 12 February 2011, which is reflected in the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed on 17 February 2011. f. In the AO from JAM, enclosure (4), it was recommended that Petitioner's request be partially granted by redacting the Article 92 (failure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9127 13
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. 1 CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board was persuaded that Petitioner’s RE-3E (inducted/enlisted -in error) reentry code was correctly assigned. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9132 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9141 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9143 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sire Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9148 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his promotion to lieutenant junior grade (pay grade O-2) with a date of rank and effective date of 6 June 2007 (the day after his disenrollment from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS)), and promotion to lieutenant (pay grade O-3) with a date of rank and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9155-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. ‘Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board ~ requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a.zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9161 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered che advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/063 dtd 20 Feb 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9167 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, issued on 6 July 2006, be changed. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Petitioner entered the Marine Corps on 22 June 1998. The Board concludes that based upon him being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9170 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed - enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's date of rank to sergeant be restored to her original date of rank on 1 April 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 May 2014-and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9172 13
Petitioner provided a supporting statement from Sergeant S---, affirming that since he had reason to believe his girlfriend, whom he thought was pregnant with his child, was receiving threats from her ex-boyfriend who still had a key to her house, Petitioner could not have stopped him from driving himself without a “physical altercation.” Sergeant S---‘s statement further reflects that “[Petitioner’s] actions were that of a concerned Marine and were within [sic] good intent” and that “My...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9174 13
You requested that your “MBK5” {expiration of term of service) separation code and “RE-1A" (eligible for reenlistment code} reentry code issued on 22 May 2011 be changed on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). , R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9175 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session; considered your application on 15 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9182 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9184 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 58. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 1 July 2012 to 31 March 2013 (copy at Tab A), in accordance with the reviewing officer (RO)’s letter of 22 May 2013 (at enclosure (1)), by raising the mark in section K.3...