DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
CRS
Docket No: 8887-13
4 March 2014
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your .
application on 5 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures. applicable to the proceedings of. this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application,: together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
_ regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
_ record, the Board found that: the evidence. submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
©rror or injustice. . re
automated teller machine (ATM) card on’ seven ectasions. The
In its review of your application: the Board carefully weighed
7 -all potentially. mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
|. record of service, and the contention that the sentence you
received from the court-martial was unfair and unjust. The
Board concluded that these factors were insufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your service, given the serious nature of
your misconduct, which ultimately resulted in your discharge.
Regarding your sentence at your SPCM, the Board found that it
was neither: unfair nor unjust. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted. that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by.
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequentily,. when applying for a correction of an official
naval record,’ the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable: material error or injustice.
Sincerely, — .
ROBERT D, ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8243 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2014. The Board found the sentence in your case was appropriate considering the serious nature of your offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR554 11
DEPA U TMENT OF THE NAVY D FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 oo BOA a CRS Docket L? A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 09_39_10 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeitures of $44 per month for six months, and a bad conduct discharge. duty and requested execution of the bad conduct discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11993 14
- A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. The BOI found by a vote of three to zero, that you had committed misconduct, and although -the reason was supported by evidence, found that there was not sufficient evidence to recommend your separation from the Navy. The .Board found that the CO’s decision to.impose NJP was based on facts and circumstances surrounding the incident, and that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2733 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded this factor was not sufficient to remove the NUP from your official records given the facts that you were found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03627-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00157-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 16 October 1985. You were discharged with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3849 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7629 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors present in your case, such as your prior honorable service. '.Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official «maval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2731 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...