NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05217 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05228 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. The Board believed you were fortunate to have received a general characterization of service, because normally sailors who are administratively separated for misconduct receive other than honorable discharges. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05231 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05232-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2013 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You then requested an under conditions other than honorable (OTH) discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for a 63...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05247 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05248-12
5248-12 il Feb 13 Dear 4 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552... A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations and-policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05258 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and, on 25 June 1984, you received an OTH discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05267-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to consult counsel and have your case heard before an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05273-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05278-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was forwarded with the recommendation that you receive a general characterization of service due to misconduct, and you were so discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05283-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05291-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05301-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05302 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error ana...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05308 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2013. You received a forfeiture of pay, restriction and extra duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05310 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05324-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/220 dated 14 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05331-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05332-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05334-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05355-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing two administrative remarks entries (page 11) dated 16 July 2007, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Sproul, Mr. Whalen, and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, a determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05368 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) for UIC: 21825. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN DA ‘ SH Recorder Acti ecorder 5s Pursuant to the delegation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05375-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/215 dated 11 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05383-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05391 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. A review of your discharge was completed by the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05397 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rating (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05410-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 8 December 1975, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05413-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 20 Jun 12, a copy of which is attached. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05433-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s disabled child became ineligible for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage effective 13 August AULA: 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and George, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05436 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to consult with legal counsel and subsequently requested an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05453 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rating (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05466 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Furthermore, the Board believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05489-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish credit for time in Delayed Entry Program (DEP) and entitlement to Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 0550-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2012 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05525-12
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman and Ms. Trucco and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In view of the above, the Board recommends the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 6 June 1994, he received an RE-1R reentry code vice an RE-4 reentry code,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05529 12
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1430 Ser g12/0509 atd 24 Sep Ls (3) Subject's naval record fl Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected ‘to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. 4, The Board, consisting ot: ME: zealman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 0553-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged with an honorable discharge vice an other than honorable discharge issued on 11 January 1992. The Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following limited corrective action. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05545 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect at least three years of entry grade credit (EGC) for his Doctor of Philosophy degree. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Chapman and Genteman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05554-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2013. The Board concluded that these factors were insufficient to warrant upgrade of your discharge, given the seriousness of your offenses. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05562 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rating (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05577 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480 BAN Docket: 05577-12 14 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was transferred to the Retired Reserve List...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05581-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS- 314 dtd 10 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05595 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rating (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05602 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. On 12 May 1980, you again received NJP for UA from your unit for a period of 15 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05610-12
It is noted that Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) has modified section K.4 (reviewing officer comments) of the contested report by changing the name “Bathurst” to “Featherstone.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05612-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05630 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05631-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05638 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05646 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At the time of your service, a conduct mark average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.