Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05413-12
Original file (05413-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
_ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 .

 

JET
Docket No, 5413-12.
21 Mar 13

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

“Ro three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 March 2013. Your allegations of error and
‘injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 20 Jun
12, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
_ concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. ,

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have-
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and ,
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by

the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. 5413-12

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

TNR ned
- ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN

Exécutive Director
Acting

 

Enclosure: CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2¢ Jun 12

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2575-13

    Original file (NR2575-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 25 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3274-13

    Original file (NR3274-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 27 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02471-12

    Original file (02471-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5471-12 21 Mar 13 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted _of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3245 13

    Original file (NR3245 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on: 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 19 Jun 13 and CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 31 Oct 13, a copies of which are attached, and were previously provided. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the _ existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR773 14

    Original file (NR773 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who are retired are not ¢€ the benefits. Because my retirement date followed 50 closely behind the 1 memo (2270un2002) , the memo was release of the Post 9/11 GI Bil not well known at my command and key points of the memo were not ement.” However, the Board disseminated to me before my retir formation about the Post-9/11 found that whether as you claim in GI Bill was not disseminated to you or the command before your retirement, information about the Post-9/1i GI Billi has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12

    Original file (10116 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05581-12

    Original file (05581-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS- 314 dtd 10 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0311-13

    Original file (NR0311-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, ‘Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314/008 dtd 29 Aug 12, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05829-12

    Original file (05829-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No, 5829-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the © existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11359 12

    Original file (11359 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NN Cc re DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tye oe Fee pee