_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. 5273-12
11 Feb 13
Dear &@
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your.
application on 11 February 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 9 Jul 12,
a copy of which is attached. -
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence: submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action. cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. 5273-12
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
loro
W. DEAN PFE
_ Executive D2
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05273-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. As you have not demonstrated that you were entitled to a combined rating in excess of 40% on 16 December 1980, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5273 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) dated 28 June 1999, and inaccurate derogatory material referencing assignment to weight control. f. Both advisory opinions, enclosure (2), received from Headquarters Marine Corps (JPL and MIQ) regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NUP recommend his request be denied...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09807 11
9807-11 12 Mar 12 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552: A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12443 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10126 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05383-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05283-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05207-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 5207-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05204-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05331-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.