NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12876 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an etre 2. naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 13097 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the’...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 13172 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2012. Although the record is incomplete, you remained on active duty until 15 January 1994, when you received a general discharge by reason of unsatisfactory performance by failing to conform to weight standards. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR11423 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 JRE Docket No. Documentery material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12144 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. RB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12735 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in 1 support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, y regulations, and poli¢ies. tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 27 March 2013, 21 August 2013, and 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12995 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your receipt of substantial disability ratings from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) effective the day following your discharge from the Navy was not considered probative of the existence of error or injustice in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR273 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 January 1989. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR487 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your reported receipt of a disability rating of 10% from the Department of Veterans Affairs...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR7104 12
Your receipt of disability ratings from the VA for conditions not rated by the PEB is not probative of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military service. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were entitled to a higher disability rating from the PEB for your knee condition or that you suffered from any other conditions that should have been rated by the PEB, the Board was unable to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR7709 12
Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2033 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administr regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In this regard, it noted that at some time after marijuana is used, x nanograms of THC metabolites will be present in the user’s urine, and that that amount will diminish over time until the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR7889 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2014. iy he ter careful and conscientious consideration of the fte e entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR9300 12
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on.8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...