Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05383-12
Original file (05383-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JET
Docket No. 5383-12
11 Feb 13

 

Dear &

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 use 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 February 2013. Your allegations of error’ and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 20 Jun
12, a copy of which is attached.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, ‘your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. © ,

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No.

5383-12

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

Vo Sxsk

W. DEAN PF
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05383-07

    Original file (05383-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05383-09

    Original file (05383-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5383 14

    Original file (NR5383 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05383-98

    Original file (05383-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thereafter, the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to homosexuality. On 29 May 1980, the Naval Discharge Review Board upgraded your undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. VnfitnessV1 as the reason At the time, this reason for separation was In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your service record for any mitigating factors which might warrant changing the reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 09807 11

    Original file (09807 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9807-11 12 Mar 12 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552: A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12443 11

    Original file (12443 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10126 11

    Original file (10126 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05273-12

    Original file (05273-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05283-12

    Original file (05283-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05207-12

    Original file (05207-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 5207-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant.